|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 21st, 2012, 05:22 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 32
|
Vivitar fd 28-90mm or Tokina 35-70mm
Hey all,
I've actually got an Nex 5n, which I use to take video and thought that this section would be the best place to post this question. I currently have the kit 18-55mm lens and a few primes, but would like to get a medium zoom lens. I didn't want to spend much say sub $200 and I am considering the two below options. I have read pretty good things about both. Vivitar fd 28-90mm F2.8 Tokina AT-X 35-70mm F2.8 The only thing putting me off the Vivitar is the size / weight for my nex 5n. What are your thought? Which one would you choose or am I missing an obvious contender? Cheers, Rich |
November 23rd, 2012, 04:45 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brownsville, OR
Posts: 116
|
Re: Vivitar fd 28-90mm or Tokina 35-70mm
If you are referring to the vivitar 28-90 2.8-3.5, it's extremely varifocal, so not a chance it will keep focus as you zoom in or out, but it has an extremely nice macro ability and is pretty sharp.
Don't know much about the tokina. |
November 23rd, 2012, 05:59 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
Re: Vivitar fd 28-90mm or Tokina 35-70mm
Very few still camera lenses will keep focus as you zoom. My 24-105 Canon L is close but not right on. If you want to zoom during a shot you need a cine zoom.
Some of those old Vivitar lenses were pretty good. And the Tokina lenses I've been involved with are decent as well. I recently got an old Nikkor 35-70 f2.8 from eBay. It's in perfect condition, looks like new. Got it for under $500. I did a test with the FS100 with my Zess f1.4 50, the Canon 24105 and the Nikkor, all at 50mm and the same f-stop. The Zeiss, naturally, looked the best, and to my eye and a few others who saw the test, the Nikkor looked better than the Canon. |
| ||||||
|
|