|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 1st, 2012, 02:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
|
SAL1650 vs SAL2470CZ
i have both lenses for my FS100, but i feel that the 16-50 is sharper than the CZ 24-70
people said 16-50 is par focal and CZ24-70 is not, but i have them the opposite way My 16-50 is not par focal, and CZ 24-70 is surprisingly par focal |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2012, 08:38 AM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 30
|
Re: SAL1650 vs SAL2470CZ
My 16-50 is not parfocal either. (even though they claim it is.)
My rough numbers from just the few people I've talked/emailed is about 3/4 of them are not parfocal.
__________________
Stuff I gots...2 ea FS100's nikon 24, 28, 35, 50, 85, 2 Kit lens', 35 and 85 Rokinon, Canon 60D |
|
|
|
|
October 1st, 2012, 08:27 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 59
|
Re: SAL1650 vs SAL2470CZ
Mine wasn't either but I used a cheapo mount adapter (with an aperture ring) and I wondered if that made a difference since par focal depends on very precise calibrations. Are you guys using Sony adapters?
|
|
|
|
|
October 1st, 2012, 08:31 PM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
|
Re: SAL1650 vs SAL2470CZ
yes, i use LAEA2
anyone use 24-70CZ? i wanna know how other people experience that lens on FS100. Since that lens is for full frame camera, is it because of that i don't get the footage as sharp as i get from 5Dmk2 with 24-70? I feel that the SAL1650 do better in sharpness, but the color is not as good as the CZ2470 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
