|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 3rd, 2011, 06:09 PM | #46 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minneap, MN
Posts: 25
|
Re: FS100 or F3?
Quote:
But if you are only planning on shooting to the card, then the FS100 is great! |
|
August 4th, 2011, 02:33 AM | #47 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Re: FS100 or F3?
Both cameras have the same sensor and it's true that the A to.D converters are on the sensor chip. But beyond that these are two very different cameras. The F3 DSP is probably a 12 or 14 bit DSP. You need at least 12 bits to get the 12+ stops of dynamic range that S-log gives you. On the other hand the DSP in the FS100 is probably only 10 bit and this is why the images look different. The more bits your DSP has e easier it is to apply sophisticated filtering and gamma directions etc. The difference in DSP also explains the lower dynamic range of the FS100 as some of the data coming of the sensor will be truncated to fit the DSPs limited bit depth.
I love my F3's. They are a real pleasure to use. the ergonomics may not be perfect but they are still a pleasure to use. I'd rather shoot with an F3 than an FS100.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
August 4th, 2011, 09:53 AM | #48 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,596
|
Re: FS100 or F3?
|
August 4th, 2011, 10:21 AM | #49 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: FS100 or F3?
"I would, too, but my bank account says I'll like the FS100 better."
Ain't it the truth, ain't it the truth.... |
| ||||||
|
|