|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 7th, 2010, 05:48 PM | #16 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 23
|
nx5
Quote:
In reference to the above mentioned quote... does shooting in 720 6oP a nicer format than the AX2000's 1080 30P ?? Im not all that familiar with comparing these two, and your input would be great! thanks |
|
September 7th, 2010, 08:02 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Red Lodge, Montana
Posts: 889
|
Andrew,
"Nicer" seems like such a subjective term that I'm not quite sure what you have in mind. Nicer for who to shoot what kind of video for what audience? Here's what I see as the basic difference. 720/30p is 30 frames per minute. Some people who like their video to have a "film" look like 720/30p. Others like it when they are shooting other cams with 720/30p like some of the DSLRs. On the other hand, 720/60p is sixty full frames per second. This means you get a smoother reproduction of fast motion and less tendency for juddering images when you pan the camera. A lot of pro-sports games are televised in 720p/60 for this reason. Some dance videographers also like 720p/60 for the same reason. As I recall, Ron Evans has a number of detailed posts on the pros and cons of these frame rates. Here is one. http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nxc...raid-720p.html |
September 8th, 2010, 01:09 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Iasi, Romania
Posts: 121
|
It would be nice if AX/NX had the ability to shoot 30 frames per minute, Everybody likes timelapse, right?
I know you meam "per second" but I remembered why I hate Sony: for ripping some nice features from these cameras. |
September 8th, 2010, 07:37 AM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Far better to timelapse in post I find - that way you can vary the frame rate to suit the subject and tempo of the film. Shoot in HDV mode and a 16gig card will last 6¼ hours running continuously.
|
| ||||||
|
|