|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2nd, 2014, 11:35 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 232
|
VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
Hey guys,
Just had a play around with a friend's VG20 as I'm currently in the market to get two new cameras to replace my Sony Z1 and I'm still undecided what to get. Firstly, the main purpose for my new camera purchases will be Live Pro Wrestling Events and Weddings. In regards to wrestling filming, I need something that can compete with my Z1 handheld, my example below isn't the best I've done, but the first link that came up. So I need a decent zoom, I can't use prime lenses when shooting a wrestling event. In terms of Weddings, I feel the VG20 will provide a "nicer" look then the Panasonic AC90 in terms of the colours and shallow DOF. And with weddings, I will probably use a mixture of my Samyang Primes that already have. I know it all comes down to opinions and how they suit a persons own shooting style, but I'm just trying to understand the pros and cons of both. Thanks Matt |
February 9th, 2014, 09:39 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
I've actually tried using a VG20 for an indie rasslin' show - the shallow DoF of S35 not ideal for sports, particularly if you're moving around a lot.
I'd think a Sony RX10 would be better for such shooting.... |
February 10th, 2014, 05:56 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 232
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
Yeah, I used his VG20 this past weekend at a show and found it to look a bit too stuttery when moving where as the Z1 looks better.
The RX10 does look good, but I'm not sure how it would feel shooting wrestling and other live events on it because it's so light. And the 30 minute limit means I couldn't have one unmanned. |
February 14th, 2014, 07:33 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 170
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
Matt wrote: "looks a bit too stuttery" Were you shooting 25P? Try 50i as it has better motion interpolation (better than even 50P due to the nature of field blending) but I agree with most, a small sensor camera with a greater depth of focus will be easier to work with in this situation if you are 'in with the action' OR a very wide angle lens (say 19mm FF equiv) with at least 90-100 degrees field of view and set to infinity focus.
|
February 15th, 2014, 04:00 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 232
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
Quote:
Yeah, I think a traditional camcorder suits the way I work better. |
|
February 15th, 2014, 04:52 PM | #6 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
Quote:
|
|
March 6th, 2014, 11:50 AM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Zebulon, NC
Posts: 6
|
Re: VG20 vs Panasonic AG-AC90
I know I am late to the party...I have the AC90 and VG30. Used both at an MMA fight. Hands down you will want the AC90 for the wrestling. Weddings the VG. I have two AC90's for the fights as matter of fact.
I was able to somewhat clean up the VG footage with NeatVideo but the AC needed much less. Check out strykerfilms.com for some samples. |
| ||||||
|
|