|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 23rd, 2009, 07:43 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 8
|
Has anyone done the world cam upgrade?
|
April 30th, 2009, 04:36 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 99
|
It should be included as standard - its omission makes it a step backwards from the Z1.
__________________
www.pfilm.co.uk |
May 1st, 2009, 11:24 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 30
|
I spoke to a Sony rep once about a year ago and he implied that the omission of PAL functionality was because they were afraid that gray imports would flood the U.S. market. I guess they're O.K. with converting the cameras now that the market for them has matured in the U.S. Note that eligible cameras have to be purchased directly from Sony or an authorized reseller, so they're still trying to protect U.S. sales.
Yrs, Hoi |
May 1st, 2009, 04:18 PM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
If I saved $300 by not having PAL on my Z7, I'm happy to have that extra $300. If I need to shoot something in PAL, then the extra $300 will probably pay off in ten-fold from overseas clients. Now I might just be spreading rumors with this, but I know I heard somewhere that people thought the Z1 used software to convert to PAL. Kinda like the software to convert to 24fps. Either of these features took away from the quality. But the Z7 upgrade is more hardware based, so there isn't a quality loss when using one format or the other. Again, I don't have any solid info to back up the above paragraph, but if it is true, then the Z7 + upgrade is a step forward from the Z1.
__________________
Nothing says you're a serious video maker like S-VHS |
|
May 4th, 2009, 10:22 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
I'd be interested to hear if anyone has had this done as well.
I agree with the posts posing the question if you'd really use it? Even when I have shot overseas, I've wanted it to be ntsc anyway - so unless my clients demanded PAL, I suspect I'll also save my money. Having said that - I also agree that it'd be very nice if this was something already included. Or to simply make it available as a firmware upgrade that we could perform ourselves. I wonder how many bites Sony has gotten from this. Incidentally - when I inquired about this with Sony less than a year ago - I was quoted $500. So the price has come down.... |
May 5th, 2009, 12:51 AM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Knokke-Heist, Belgium
Posts: 963
|
Quote:
I'm glad I bought my Z7 from an official dealer in Belgium, but I paid way too much in comparison with the same unit that would have come from the US, and that doesn't make me glad. |
|
May 6th, 2009, 03:44 PM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Venice ITALY
Posts: 22
|
Has anyone done the world cam upgrade?
I Have done the upgrade. I live in Europe but often i work with NTSC countries so i had to do it. It works perfectly, same as the Z1. With this upgrade, you get 24P 25P 30P 50i and 60i in the same camera. pritty nice, shame Sony does not do it as default!!!
|
May 11th, 2009, 05:23 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 944
|
Please someone correct me if Canon, JVC or Panasonic has cameras in this price range that can do NTSC and PAL, or have the option for an upgrade to do both. I would love if it came as a default, but it seems like Sony is offering something that I have not heard offered by any other brand. So I have to give props to Sony for at least the option of the feature.
__________________
Nothing says you're a serious video maker like S-VHS |
May 12th, 2009, 07:12 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Salida, Colorado
Posts: 561
|
Does this have anything to do with why all the retailers have the S270 on backorder?
|
| ||||||
|
|