|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 4th, 2008, 09:53 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 24
|
Difference Recording to Tape and CF
made a test today.. recorded HDV footage simultaneous to tape and compact flash unit.
putting the same footage in one timeline results in different lenght of the clips the compact flash unit stores about 1 second less than the tape shows. it's not the problem to have 1 second less on card, but that means, that it's not possible to restore a project, which was captured from card when capturing it by tape later.. so all the importet CF footage has to be stored on harddisk to be shure to edit it in the future. no more restoring with project files possible... has anyone else tested that? regards, clemens fischer
__________________
DALEYELAMA visual pre & postproduction w w w . d a l e y e l a m a . c o m |
April 4th, 2008, 10:03 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Williamstown Mass
Posts: 192
|
How long was the clip? Was the missing second at the begging or end of the clip or did it have drop outs throughout?
kdbf |
April 4th, 2008, 10:11 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
|
I have noticed that the video recording on the CF card starts more quickly than it does on the tape. I have also noticed that the red light on the CF unit is still blinking after the tape transport has stopped.
I believe that this is probably why the recommended Sony CF cards are so much faster than the minimum spec speed of 133x. I don't know that there is any way that this could really be designed better though. I certainly don't want the record to CF delayed to match what is going to tape. As a documentary guy, I am not so much worried about a perfect match for the CF and tape recorded clips timing wise. I just sleep better knowing that in the worst case scenario (which does happen every so often) I have a backup to that interview that was so incredibly hard to arrange! |
April 4th, 2008, 11:06 AM | #4 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vienna
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
yes.. it's a great thing. but as i wrote.. if you have to cleanup your harddisk, it's not possible to reactivate a finished project.
__________________
DALEYELAMA visual pre & postproduction w w w . d a l e y e l a m a . c o m |
|
April 4th, 2008, 11:21 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 99
|
To clarify: Do you mean that the footage recorded to card has a different timecode to that recorded to tape?
|
April 4th, 2008, 11:37 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 107
|
HDV is not frame accurate anyway, so you cannot really do a restore from tape as what you recapture is likely to be off by several frames. The best backup is to always have your project files backed up on a 2nd or 3rd hard drive
|
April 11th, 2008, 03:15 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
1: I suspect that the extra 1 sec on the tape is to allow the tape to run up to speed.
2: The CF will continue to flash after recording stops because it will still be dumping data from the memory buffer to the card.
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
April 11th, 2008, 08:24 AM | #8 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 23
|
|
| ||||||
|
|