Z7U or EX1...tough decision. - Page 8 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony HVR-Z7 / HVR-S270
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Sony HVR-Z7 / HVR-S270
Handheld and shoulder mount versions of this Sony 3-CMOS HDV camcorder.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:49 AM   #106
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Hartzell View Post
I don't get it?

Not quite the "test" results I was looking for. Lets hope for a good review.
My primary concern is performance in extreme low light, so I quickly tested a Z1 and Z7 in the 2 comps and settings I commonly use in extreme low light, which is 15db 1/30 and full telephoto. The images were essentially the same with the Z7 winning at telephoto because of the lens, which is good for me, but I am very dissapointed that the Z7's chips are no more sensitive or cleaner for that matter than the 3+ yr old Z1.
Bruce Ostrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:49 AM   #107
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
Try the Z7 in 30p and 24p and see if you don't like the results better.
Laurence Kingston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:53 AM   #108
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurence Kingston View Post
Try the Z7 in 30p and 24p and see if you don't like the results better.
Already did and I am pleased with the progressive modes, especially compared to the bogus 24F modes of FX/Z1, but the light sensitivity is still no different than the Z1.

I would start converting my project workflow to 30P and maybe 24P just for the cleaner stills, but I work in Sony Vegas and I have heard grumblings on how poorly Vegas is handling slow motion interpolation of progressive footage.....
Bruce Ostrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 12:10 PM   #109
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbia, CT
Posts: 168
Bruce, thanks much for the pictures. If you feel like you have the time, it would be really sweet if you could shoot a grayscale chart, or color chip chart (or both), if you have these on hand. I'm not completely sure, but I think there are a few places that you can find these charts for a free download. I'm interested to see how these cameras perform under normal lighting conditions with proper illumination. Also, shooting these charts at full gain would tell us lots about these cameras as well.

Thanks for your posts and interests.

Greg Hartzell
Greg Hartzell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 12:20 PM   #110
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Ostrout View Post
Already did and I am pleased with the progressive modes, especially compared to the bogus 24F modes of FX/Z1, but the light sensitivity is still no different than the Z1.

I would start converting my project workflow to 30P and maybe 24P just for the cleaner stills, but I work in Sony Vegas and I have heard grumblings on how poorly Vegas is handling slow motion interpolation of progressive footage.....
You need to change the shutter rate too: 30 or 24 depending on the frame rate. I get a real jump in low light brightness when I do this.
Laurence Kingston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 12:47 PM   #111
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
Laurence - you're presumably slowing the shutter speed by more than a stop when you switch from 60i to 24p, so I'm not surprised you get a 'jump in low light brightness'. You should be able to film in less than half the light.

tom.
Tom Hardwick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 01:38 PM   #112
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Clermont, FL.
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Hardwick View Post
Laurence - you're presumably slowing the shutter speed by more than a stop when you switch from 60i to 24p, so I'm not surprised you get a 'jump in low light brightness'. You should be able to film in less than half the light.

tom.
Tom, yes that is the case. I was responding to this post:

Quote:
Already did and I am pleased with the progressive modes, especially compared to the bogus 24F modes of FX/Z1, but the light sensitivity is still no different than the Z1.
He should be seeing quite a marked difference. I know I am.
Laurence Kingston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 01:45 PM   #113
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
Laurence if you have some time can you post stills of the difference? Thanks

Monday
Monday Isa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25th, 2008, 08:42 PM   #114
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 73
Thanks for the still, Bruce. I for one would be very interested to see the Z1 at 60i with high gain vs. Z7 at 24p with high gain. This is where the difference should shine through, so to speak?
Gabriel Chiefetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2008, 08:54 PM   #115
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurence Kingston View Post
You need to change the shutter rate too: 30 or 24 depending on the frame rate. I get a real jump in low light brightness when I do this.
The settings are in the file name. I was at 15db 1/30 shutter which I most often use in lowlight weddings. going to 24P 1/24 is no better than 60i 1/15 because the illumination is basically the same, but the footage is generally unusable because of excessive blur
Bruce Ostrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2008, 08:57 PM   #116
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel Chiefetz View Post
Thanks for the still, Bruce. I for one would be very interested to see the Z1 at 60i with high gain vs. Z7 at 24p with high gain. This is where the difference should shine through, so to speak?
Not much difference at all. It seems the gain noise is a little finer on the Z7, but for all practical purposes they are pretty much the same.

I will have much better feedback this weekend as I will be shooting a lot of real world footage in various lighting conditions.
Bruce Ostrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26th, 2008, 11:30 PM   #117
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 73
Hmmm, interesting. So how does this square with the folks who are saying that the Z7 is comparable to the PD170 in low light?
Gabriel Chiefetz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2008, 12:10 AM   #118
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Ostrout View Post
Already did and I am pleased with the progressive modes, especially compared to the bogus 24F modes of FX/Z1, but the light sensitivity is still no different than the Z1.

I would start converting my project workflow to 30P and maybe 24P just for the cleaner stills, but I work in Sony Vegas and I have heard grumblings on how poorly Vegas is handling slow motion interpolation of progressive footage.....

BRUCE I have had no problems with slow motion in Vegas I shoot in 24p and 30p for most on my weddings. When shooting in 24p the shutter speed should be set to 48. 30p shutter 30.THe footage on my wedding demo is shot with 90% HVR-V1U'S 30P MODE and 10%HDR-FX1 60I rendered to 30p Timeline Sony Vegas Pro 8.
http://www.dvdaction.net/dvdaction_002.htm

Also when comparing the Z7U to the FX1 as for as gain the Z7 low gain is -6 and the high gain is +21 while the FX1 low gain starts @ 0 and goes to +18. So can you say that the 0 gain setting is the same on both cams when comparing them.
Brian Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2008, 12:59 AM   #119
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 143
Brian, I don't own a Z7 - but own a Z1 and a new EX1.

2 questions

I noticed you shoot 24p for weddings. Any issues with that when it comes to panning (motion judder). I assume if you keep your pans slow you are ok.
Any issues with dance at 24p? I really like the look and thinking of going this route. Any advice?

Secondly, based on the feedback i'm seeing above - would you say the sensitivity of the Z7 is basically the same as the Z1 with the progressive capability of the V1

Paul
Paul Dhadialla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27th, 2008, 09:27 AM   #120
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Dhadialla View Post
Brian, I don't own a Z7 - but own a Z1 and a new EX1.

2 questions

I noticed you shoot 24p for weddings. Any issues with that when it comes to panning (motion judder). I assume if you keep your pans slow you are ok.
Any issues with dance at 24p? I really like the look and thinking of going this route. Any advice?

Secondly, based on the feedback i'm seeing above - would you say the sensitivity of the Z7 is basically the same as the Z1 with the progressive capability of the V1

Paul
The clips on the demo footage is 30p you do have to use slower pans with 24p footage. I post some wedding clips in 24p next week.

I own the Z7, EX and HC1 sold my V1, z1, and Fx1. The Z7 does have better low light sensitivity than the FX1 . I will borrow an FX1 and try to do a comparision between the three cams this weekend.
Brian Rhodes is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony HVR-Z7 / HVR-S270


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network