|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 23rd, 2009, 05:37 PM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 427
|
I love the feel of the Z5. Slightly heavier than the PD-170, with the MRC-1 attached, but more balanced. Great LCD placement as well but I guess this has been covered in other posts.
|
March 23rd, 2009, 06:37 PM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 135
|
Hey !!! love my z5 and getting in love with my new(second camera)fx1000
great duo. Last weekend my second camera man use the FX1000 for the first time,and at the end of the wedding he just say ! HEY BOSS NEVER AGAIN 4X3,coming from pd 170 the QUALITY IS NOTORIUS!!! Be my guest!!!............Franklin |
March 23rd, 2009, 07:20 PM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
As I said before, I shot with mine Friday and footage is really nice, particularly the outdoor stuff. There is nothing like true 16:9
|
March 23rd, 2009, 09:54 PM | #34 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
Hi Rob, Thanks for the kind words. The ceremony location was not too bad, but where the couple stood was very dark. You can see the congregation was nice and bright, but the couples faces were in the dark. The camera actually made the scene look brighter than it actually was. I do agree with you on the reception footage. There was nice accent lighting and then I provided on camera and off camera lighting as well. |
|
March 23rd, 2009, 09:57 PM | #35 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
I observed that where the couple stood it seemed quite dark, and thought the cam did quite well, but I couldn't say for sure as I wasn't there.
That is why I was so impressed by the footage...very nice Mark. |
March 23rd, 2009, 11:31 PM | #36 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 156
|
4:3 - yuk!!!!!!!!!!!
4:3 dead and buried
|
March 24th, 2009, 01:34 PM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 427
|
Mark, the couple looked somewhat dark but it looked as though there was enough ambient light to compensate but as Jeff said, without being there it's hard to tell.
|
March 24th, 2009, 07:50 PM | #38 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
|
March 25th, 2009, 09:30 PM | #39 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 156
|
16:9
|
March 26th, 2009, 08:12 AM | #40 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,945
|
To be honest Martin, I'm so used to it, it just doesn't phase me anymore. Hell, I still get a very occasional request for a finished video to be dumped to VHS!
|
March 26th, 2009, 08:56 AM | #41 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
U.S. corporations tend to be very slow in adopting new technology.
|
March 26th, 2009, 12:59 PM | #42 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 427
|
I'm starting to push the issue myself, now that I have the Z5, but not one customer has asked me for 16:9 or HD.
|
March 26th, 2009, 02:19 PM | #43 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
Two days ago, a bride watched my demo DVDs, all shot with VX2100, but it wasn't until I showed her footage from the FX1000 that she went wow. That was the first time that happened.
The way it filled up the screen knocked her out. Then yesterday, for the first time, a bride asked me if I shoot in widescreen. When I said yes, she booked. So, it is starting to happen. |
March 26th, 2009, 02:38 PM | #44 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 427
|
That's good to hear Jeff. That's what I'm counting on.
|
March 26th, 2009, 02:45 PM | #45 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Newbern, TN
Posts: 414
|
Hey Jeff, I bet it won't be long until we're being asked about blu!
__________________
Tim |
| ||||||
|
|