|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 10th, 2007, 05:03 AM | #16 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
But I will carry on some tests to compare them on a good pro monitor and see what happens. Thanks for the tip. What were the differences you noticed? |
|
April 10th, 2007, 10:46 AM | #17 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I find clearer detail in complex images. To me it is noticeable on a full stage shot with lots of people in a performance video. In standard definition DV mode the Z1 doesn't especially impress me, it looks a lot like my PDX-10. But shooting HDV and downconverting while capturing seems to give a sharper image.
But you should do your own tests and decide whether the risk of dropouts is greater than any improvement the image may have. Personally, I don't think I've had any dropout issues in shooting around 80 hours of performances this way. I have used Sony premium tapes exclusively since I bought the camera. |
April 10th, 2007, 11:53 AM | #18 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
That doesn't mean that you might be right and what you are proposing might be even better. Today I will be shooting just with my camera, and I will use the chance to shoot in DV and HDV and see what happens Thanks for the tip. Carlos |
|
April 10th, 2007, 08:10 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 479
|
Absolutely. I'm doing a tv show on a local community station on Z1s and after shooting the first interview in widescreen DV, everything is HDV until the final downconvert now. A big factor in this is the fact that I often have to shoot with 18dB gain. The downconvert does wonders for footage grainy or clean.
__________________
Mark Utley |
April 11th, 2007, 03:06 AM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
OK. Downconvert seems like an interesting and safe way to go.
I also talked to a friend from a production company here that records for Discovery in HDV with Z1s, and my concern for eventual dropout problems is not justified. Next concern is how I will frame for two sizes now: 16:9 and cropped for downconvert 4:3 DV. |
April 11th, 2007, 05:52 AM | #21 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Turn on the markers in the menu. You can view 4:3 markers in your frame that will remind you as you shoot what the cropped frame will be.
|
April 11th, 2007, 08:48 AM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
OK. I've done both things: gone back to HDV and add side-markers. The center mark I've kept it off, as that might activate a tendency to center things around it.
Another thing which I did was a second ASSIGN button, activating "Steadyshot" on button 2. Button 1 was already for Underscan. Now that I was back in HDV allowed me to see what Boyd was talking about. What other functions have you found practical for the ASSIGN buttons? Perhaps the latter should deserve a separate thread for people to suggest what has worked for them. |
April 11th, 2007, 08:58 AM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
I use:
WB OUTDR LV+ WB OUTDR LV- REC REVIEW STEADYSHOT HYPER GAIN ALLSCAN MODE |
April 11th, 2007, 09:26 AM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
|
April 11th, 2007, 09:36 AM | #25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
If your preset WB is set to OUTDOOR, you can use the WB OUTDR LV+
WB OUTDR LV- buttons to quickly adjust colour to your liking. |
April 11th, 2007, 09:41 AM | #26 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
|
April 11th, 2007, 09:47 AM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Avoiding colour correction in editing saves you time in the edit, saves you time in rendering, and give you a slightly better image (any rendering can degrade your image from the original)
|
April 11th, 2007, 10:33 AM | #28 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
I think it's only there, with proper monitoring and watching the editing flow, where you can achieve a balance of the whole. |
|
April 11th, 2007, 10:38 AM | #29 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Well, certainly you have a good point, but it depends on what you are working on. I do a lot of events where quick turn around can be important, so I try to avoid things that slow me down.
If I were doing a documentary or movie, that's a different story. Then you want to be able to experiment with looks in the editing. |
April 11th, 2007, 10:43 AM | #30 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Of course I did guess that what you were talking about, and you certainly would be right for quicker turn arounds.
In my case I am and have been working on documentaries, and I got to do in editing what would have taken me lots of money to get beautiful results. What I will try to do, if possible, is to do the final tune up on a higher grade editing suite. Let's hope the budget, which I still don't know what will exactly be, will allow that. Last edited by Carlos E. Martinez; April 11th, 2007 at 11:57 AM. |
| ||||||
|
|