|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 12th, 2007, 01:15 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Z1 & Chroma Key
Hi there
I've run several searches through the board on Chroma Key set up, which have given me all the basic info. However I've a couple of queries about using the Z1 for this technique. I shall be out putting to SD for a DVD. Which is the best setting to use to make the keying easier? I often shoot CF25 for SD useage and get good results. Would it be a good idea to use this for green screening? or shoot 50i and then deinterlace with say Virtual dub? Also would it be better to turn the sharpness down to say 6 or 7 to help avoid green spill? I usually set it at 10 or 11. I intend to light the background separatelyt and backlight my subject. Finally would using a filter like say a Black Mist or Pro mist help or hinder the technique? Thanks for any advice on setting up the Z1. Cheers Gareth |
March 12th, 2007, 10:47 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 513
|
Hi,
You probably won't want to use any CF modes on the Z1U when shooting on a greenscreen. It halves the resolution (see ww.adamwilt.com/HDV/cineframe.html) Deinterlacing might work fine. I've tried it both ways with Cineform in After Effects and didn't notice much if any difference. You won't want to use any filters either. I usually capture in HDV and key in HDV then downrez in After Effects to SD. The best thing you can do before a shoot is TEST your ideas. See if it works and if you like it. There is nothing better than good old experimentation. One other thing to keep in mind is what type of footage are you shooting? Talking heads, action??? Hope this helps, Jim |
March 12th, 2007, 10:59 AM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
Thanks Jim, for your reply... Yes, I've read Adam's site which is why I've used the CF25 in HDV... no visual difference as is isn't halving the SD resolution when down converting... I'm going to have to provide a downconverted SD version for the Graphics guy who'll be doing the keying with After Effects.. he doesn't have any HDV acquistion equipement...or Cineform, (nor do I come to that, until I get a new PC soon). I may even have to shoot DV to hand off the tape. I just wondered if anyone has used the Z1 for green screen and how they set it up? Regards Gareth |
|
March 15th, 2007, 02:59 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Egad - please don't! Both DV and HDV have a major problem for chromakey, in that both formats have low resolution colour info, so without remedial work, DV chromakeys look like they've been cut out with a cheese grater.
Shoot HDV, ingest into your NLE. Ideally, deinterlace 50/60i in post using something that will do an 'intelligent' (motion sensitive) job (e.g. Nattress, DVFilm Maker) then output as a QuickTime movie using PhotoJPEG at 100%, putting the file on a DVD-ROM. Let AfterEffects handle the scaling from HDV to SD and the included KeyLight do the keying. Set Zebras to 70% and light the background so that you get a nice even zebra pattern, then light your talent accordingly. Shoot on manual everything at HDV 50i/60i, and double check that no gain is used, and that black stretch is disabled (the only time I switch it off) - grain makes messy keys. Check your sharpness settings - 8-11, any more and the ringing effects will interfere with your key. |
March 15th, 2007, 07:53 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
HDV doesn't have huge problems for chromakeying and certainly doesn't look like it's been dragged through a cheese grater, it's a combination of skill and having the right tools.
Is it as good as starting with a better image from a great lens and uncompressed signal? No. Does that mean you can't turn out clean keys from HDV or DV? No. Shoot HDV, and if you can't ingest via component to save conversion time, then convert to a more friendly HDI than MPEG if you're working in FCP. If you're working in Canopus, Sony Vegas, or Avid Liquid, go ahead and key on the MPEG directly, or better, use the CineForm HDI. If you have Serious Magic (now Adobe) Ultra, even better. You'll have outstanding results, particularly if you stay HD to the end, prior to rendering your composite. Matt's advice on shooting is right on the money; follow that plan and you'll have good source footage, assuming you've got lighting, etc.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
March 15th, 2007, 10:39 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Hi Spot
thanks for your reply..yes I have decent lighting... soi'll go for getting that as good as I can. however editing in HDV isn't a possibility for this shoot as I'll have to hand off either the cassette or if I shoot HDV downconvert to an external Hard Drive... The guy doing the DVD has no access to HDV editing. Is is still worth shooting in HDV in thsi case? cheers Gareth |
March 15th, 2007, 10:56 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Yes. Shoot HDV, capture HDV, convert HDV to a high end codec such as Bitjazz/Sheer, CineForm, 4:2:2 YUV, etc. Ask your editor what uncompressed or lightly compressed codec he'd prefer.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
March 15th, 2007, 11:11 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wash. DC area
Posts: 154
|
Zebra/sharpness settings
Matt,
Are you saying light BG to 70%? same as foreground? I thought 50-60% IRE would do the trick. should sharpness be reduced from default setting to minus 8 or 11? thanks, chris Set Zebras to 70% and light the background so that you get a nice even zebra pattern, then light your talent accordingly. Shoot on manual everything at HDV 50i/60i, and double check that no gain is used, and that black stretch is disabled (the only time I switch it off) - grain makes messy keys. Check your sharpness settings - 8-11, any more and the ringing effects will interfere with your key.[/QUOTE] |
March 15th, 2007, 11:47 AM | #9 | |||
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I've got chromakey stuff that agencies assume is digibeta, but it's DV and some of it's PD150. I did a chromakey project last year that's one of the best keys I've done, and that was HDV, but it was HDV at SD using the AfterEffects method. It can be done, but here comes that mantra again: it had better be in focus, it had better be the right exposure, and the camera hand better be in fully manual mode. :) |
|||
March 15th, 2007, 04:45 PM | #10 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
Posts: 23
|
If you want the best chroma key you can get out of this camera, hook to a kona card and down convert to 10 bit uncompressed sd in real time. Use ultimatte advantedge as keyer and you will get perfact keys. Ive done tripple layers of keys using this and if you light well its amazing.
Quote:
|
|
March 16th, 2007, 06:39 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
thanks for that..my editing suite is getting a bit long in the tooth as despite shooting on the Z1, I use it for SD stuff, (DVD & internet) and haven't the computing power, or software upgrades to use HDV native all along the line. We've not had a need for it..yet!! So I downconvert in camera. We've no budget to go out and upgrade for this one shoot..final product will be DVD. I've enough software to capture the HDV and convert to something like higher res .avi files. Is this worth the extra effort? But the other issue is that all the background archive material will be SD... At what point will I downres so it makes a difference..compared to shooting all in DV or in camera downres'd HDV???.. I guess I'm tying myself in knots here... Cheers Gareth |
|
March 16th, 2007, 07:51 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
It's definitely worth the effort, IMO. The HDV image is as good or better than most any Betacam you might have, and it's useable for the future.
If your backgound is SD, you might want to convert straight to uncompressed SD for this one.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
March 16th, 2007, 09:27 AM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
What would you suggest as the best way to convert to uncompressed SD.. I takre this is avi.. We use Premiere and After Effects? ... Until I update my PC I've not got any of the higher end software. Thanks again for your help Gareth |
|
April 12th, 2007, 02:10 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Ok... thanks to all for your input..
Here are some of my findings... 1) Yes shoot in highest res.. 2) Deinterlace.. I use Virtualdub Smart Deinterlace. Otherwise in DV.. I shot HDV and downres'd in camera as it was not possible for this project to use HDV..pity!! I used After Effects with Keylight plug in.. this is a great plug in and gives excellent results. Very powerful.. Still photo backgrounds give a cleaner and sharper result then motion backgrounds... I guess for the same reason HDV gives cleaner keys... you start from a higher res image... I think for my next project I'l shoot in HDV... use a still background and down res to DV for output, as I'll have all my elements in HDV or stills... this project unfortunately and had all the background footage in DV, so we stuckwith this for the keying... The AF and keylight combination was very nice though... regards gareth |
| ||||||
|
|