|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 23rd, 2007, 12:53 AM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
In case someone buys one of this, I can help make it work. The instructions are faulty, and you will need to do some adjustments as well as several tips.
But it does work. Looks like a good tool to get started. |
February 24th, 2007, 03:40 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
One last question Carlos, do you have any problems with vignetting from the "eyebrow shutters" on maximum wide angle. From your other answers I would guess that the answer is no - but I just have to check. Do you use this with any other wide angle adaptor? I have the Century 0.6X - which seems to vignette with every hood or matte box I have tried on it (and I have tried quite a few) - so I expect that this matte box would vignette with it as well, but if it does not vignette with the camera on the standard lens with maximum wide angle I would be happy.
Also what are the special instructions for assembly? Your help is much appreciated. All the best,
__________________
Graeme Last edited by Graeme Fullick; February 24th, 2007 at 07:12 PM. |
February 24th, 2007, 04:31 PM | #18 | |||
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Quote:
In any case the lens is quite protected from upper reflections as it is. There's about a 5 cm "tunnel" of MB as it is. Reflections coming from up front are the ones the flag might cut, at 45 degrees or less. To let the WA fit I had to unscrew the back ring in the MB, which carries the rubber donuts for the several lenses it can accomodate. Without the ring the diameter was exactly it. This is excellent. Now I can use my 4 x 4 filters with the WA too. :))) I was afraid to try the MB with the WA, because I also pre-supposed it wouldn't work. It certainly did. In fact, I think the back hole was designed exactly to fit that WA lens, which is not a standard diameter. I put some transparent tape over the lens ring to protect it from scratches though. I am still not sure if I will keep it. Quote:
|
|||
February 24th, 2007, 07:18 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Thanks so much Carlos - I might go ahead now. Still interested in the fact that you are not sure whether to keep it or not though. Is there any reason to not keep it if it seems to do all that you need?
__________________
Graeme |
February 25th, 2007, 04:05 AM | #20 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
About the matte-box it's different. My budget was limited when I bought mine, and I didn't know much about matte-boxes then. I had read a lot about them all, and some of the affordable ones (Formatt and Cavision) were not perfect. Zanutto, Chroziel and Vocas seemed to be the best, but too out of reach for my money. The one I thought could be the best deal was the Geardear. It was then when I saw this one on eBay and thought was worth the risk. Handling it has taught me a great deal on what should I look for if I sell this MB. But even if I don't, I am now starting to look at it with different eyes. What I can improve on it, I think, is finish quality. But as a tool it does all it's supposed to for not too much money. So whether you ask for more or not is a different question. |
|
March 2nd, 2007, 10:27 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Carlos,
I have ordered the Matte box that we are discussing. Careful examination would seem to suggest that this is almost identical to the Vocas that Century optics sell. Do you have any tips for use and assembly when I receive it in a couple of days. I remeber you saying that the assembly instructions were wrong, and was hoping to avoid any problems. Also - does anyone have a good source of reasonable quality, but not too expensive 4 x 4 filters? I have the Century Optics Tru Pol, but it cost $300 here in Australia - so I was hoping to get some a bit cheaper on the internet. All the best and thanks again for all of your help. Reagrds,
__________________
Graeme |
March 2nd, 2007, 10:52 PM | #22 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
It doesn't vignette with the .6x, although you have to be careful to align it properly. http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm...=1080&IID=1341 |
|
March 3rd, 2007, 04:05 AM | #23 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
And yes, it seems to be identical to the Vocas. Quite probably not as well finished. But costing a lot less! Quote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ughType=search It has at least three that you will need: pola screen, graduated ND and black mist. You also get a graduated blue and graduated orange, that may help on daylight color effects. There might be other sources for 4 x 4 filters in Singapur or Thailand, which is closer to you. I also ordered a threaded Hoya UV, which protects the lens. But you can't use it with the .6x Century lens. |
||
March 3rd, 2007, 04:11 AM | #24 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Contrary to the Century shade, this one allows filter rotation and the MB weight is held by the rods. |
|
March 3rd, 2007, 08:42 AM | #25 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I'm sure the mattebox is fine and offers many advantages... But I was just pointing out to Graeme that there is indeed a lens shade which works with the .6x wide angle.
|
March 3rd, 2007, 03:10 PM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Thanks Carlos, I should have the item in about 4 or 5 days. The filters look like good value compared to the cost of my Schneider polariser.
Boyd, Thanks for the advice on the Century shade. I remembered your post about this, but when I went back to the B&H site it was no longer there. I ended up buying the Cavision LM100MW, which was recommended, but unfortunately it vignettes at 15 % zoom or less - which robs me of a lot of wide angle. It's rather surprising as it looks like a very wide square shade - and well made too. I have thought of trying to cut a few mm off it - but I would probably wreck it. Once again, thanks everybody - your help is greatly appreciated.
__________________
Graeme |
March 4th, 2007, 08:17 AM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
This may sound stupid, but this very simple DIY shade could solve your problem on some situations:
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread...641#post881641 I will even try it myself, as I saw a rubber foam material, about 1/2" thick, which was light enough and stiff enough to work fine on a shade. The problem is how to secure it on the lens. But it would be light enough. |
March 8th, 2007, 05:09 AM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
Carlos,
My Matte box has just arrived - can you please give me your tips to get it to work better. At the moment it is still in the box - thought I'd wait for advice and avoid any frustration. Your help is much appreciated.
__________________
Graeme |
March 8th, 2007, 07:44 AM | #29 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Right now I am in the middle of a shooting, in another place in Brazil. Get back to Rio tomorrow at noon. Can you wait until then? I have been using the matte-box here, and it has been great. With two 4 x 4 filters. Carlos |
|
March 9th, 2007, 12:33 AM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 337
|
No problems Carlos,
Look forward to your return - enjoy the shoot.
__________________
Graeme |
| ||||||
|
|