|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,222
|
Neutral density: in-camera or 3rd party ?
How good are the Z1 in-camera neutral density filters in comparison to a top of the line from B+W ? They look ok to me, but I don't have a good screw-on ND for comparison. After some negative experiences with my Sony VX2000 in-camera ND filters, I'm more inclined to buy B+W. Which do you use?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
they're OK, but if you need exacting exposures, having quarter value glass is always better, which is one main reason for a mattebox if you're shooting outdoors.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
That's an interesting question. What negative experience did you have with the VX-2000? I've always just used the internal ND's on my Z1. Douglas makes a good point about having more options with external filters.
But putting anything in front of the lens is another chance for dust and smudges to get into the picture, and I would think it also makes flare more likely when shooting towards a bright light. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|