|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 385
|
CineFrame recording - is it progressive ?
Sony mentions their patented CineFrame mode at 30 or 24 Fps. I don't think this is really a progressive frame mode - can someone explain, and also comment on how the results look ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Here's a very thorough examination by Adam Wilt: http://adamwilt.com/HDV/cineframe.html
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 385
|
Tkanks, Boyd. That was indeed an excellent explanation.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 199
|
I would also check out Cineform's site:
http://www.cineform.com/products/Son.../CineFrame.htm VASST also has some pictures of what it looks like: CF24: http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/tr...24_cadence.htm CF30: http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/tr...30_cadence.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
I've used cineframe 25 and experimented with cineframe 24.
CF25 looks great, a little more stuttery than I used to get with 16mm but only 'coz I'm staring hard. CF 24 is definitely jerkier, especially on pans. you can clearly see the pull down pulse on steady moves. Both are noticable softer than 50i. However CF25 downrezzed to SD is very sharp compared to DV, sometime too sharp, introducing rather obvious moire patterns and interlace flicker on high frequency detail. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|