|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 4th, 2006, 06:36 PM | #46 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 242
|
A new Quicktime version of the video is now available!
A new Quicktime version of the HDV music video "Hip Hop's Dead" is now available at my website, jonfordham.com!
You can find the video here: http://www.jonfordham.com/elus.html Enjoy! |
November 23rd, 2006, 10:22 AM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 242
|
|
November 24th, 2006, 11:56 PM | #48 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
blurred or deflickered the results. I would not do that. Any non-moving object in the frame should look identical after processing with Maker. |
|
November 25th, 2006, 12:03 AM | #49 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Marcus,
What if I shot in 50i with CineFrame 25 and have been making, in Final Cut, a Photojpeg (at 75%/8 bit) quality, then conforming it in Cinema Tools to 23.98 fps vs. using one of the DVFilm plug-ins? My audio's pitch drops slightly, but not too bad. Would I get that with DVFilm? Also, do I lose more resolution? Thanks, Heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
November 25th, 2006, 08:49 AM | #50 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
OTOH, I'm also learning Graeme's tool set as it can combine many actions, and is significantly faster. After all, progressive is 'in' if your work is going to web, LCD, Plasma, DLP or laptop/ppt. Just as there's no one 'killer' camcorder, there's not one single killer app that gets rid of fields. |
|
November 28th, 2006, 10:26 PM | #51 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
2. The main benefit of 60i is that you don't have to slow the movie down 4%. Because the 60i to 24P conversion requires blending fields together (in areas of the screen where there is motion) you have to be careful about shutter speed and blown-out highlights that create an artifical high shutter speed look. This is also a consideration for 50i but not as important. 3. Assuming that you have to shoot 50i like for example you have a Euro model FX1, then convert to 25P with Maker and do all your ediiting at 25P, not 24P. You can make a 60i (NTSC) DVD movie with DVFilm Atlantis with no speed change, instead of a 24P DVD movie. If there is a transfer to film the film transfer house will do the time expansion of the dialog with ProTools or similar app. We generally like to do this rather than let the filmmaker do it as we can check the results in our screening room. Despite great efforts time expansion of dialog always suffers a slight quality loss. For original music (esp orchestral music) and effects it's better to just slow it down and not attempt a pitch correction. Then we mix it all together at the new rate (24P). Much of this is covered in SHOOTING DIGITAL if you have the old edition, The new one is not quite done yet. |
|
November 28th, 2006, 11:22 PM | #52 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Marcus,
Thanks for the response. We shot in 50i and CF25 and I'm happy with the results. Can Maker convert that to 24p cleanly? Also, everyone, Marcus' book SHOOTING DIGITAL was reviewed by me right here. Check it out and buy a copy! heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
November 29th, 2006, 05:07 AM | #53 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 176
|
Quote:
The only product we have that is applicable is Atlantis. If you make a 25P PAL-sized movie, Atlantis can convert that to 60i NTSC to make a DVD. No audio change is required since it's 25P over 60i. Quote:
|
||
November 29th, 2006, 10:41 AM | #54 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Thanks for the clarifications, Marcus!
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
January 1st, 2007, 07:33 PM | #55 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, Il.
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
-Nate "This is me in flesh, lyrically I'm the best." -Elus |
|
January 1st, 2007, 08:24 PM | #56 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
My opinion is if you're a great shooter, most cameras will work good for you. And I feel a Sony is going to be your best bet. See some Z1 footage Jon shot and I directed, found at:
www.myspace.com/904am heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
January 1st, 2007, 08:37 PM | #57 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, Il.
Posts: 85
|
I was just on your site man. Forget the footage, hook me up with Suzy or Monique. I love Sci-Fi babes. Did you shoot this in 1080i or 30CF? Hey did you do those FX shots too? Nice work guys. BTW, I sent you a friend request.
-Nate Quote:
|
|
January 1st, 2007, 08:46 PM | #58 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Suzy and Monique are the goths (and punk) in the movie. The character Billie is the scifi nutcase, as seen in the 3 Sisters clip. For more info on 9:04 AM, visit:
www.904am.com Matt Miller did the F/X, and is busy working on everything. His website can be found at www.mattmiller.net and he's one of the best! We shot in 50i, CineFrame 25, then I did a coversion to 23.98 fps in Cinema Tools, and outputted from Final Cut Pro 5.1.2. heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
January 1st, 2007, 08:56 PM | #59 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, Il.
Posts: 85
|
I've always been curious about this but could I shoot in 1080i and output at 23.98 in Cinema Tools? I think this would save me some resolution. Then I could make an SD and HD-DVD of my next film. I do have FCP 5.1.2.
-Nate Quote:
|
|
January 1st, 2007, 08:59 PM | #60 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
If you shoot in 1080i50 with CineFrame 25. If you shoot without CF25, then you have to de-interlace in your NLE, then convert to 23.98 fps. I write extensively about this method, based on Graeme Nattress' worflow, in the second edtion HDV book from VASST.
h
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
| ||||||
|
|