|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 1st, 2005, 10:49 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
|
FX1 HDV vs 10bit Uncompressed Frame
TIF Comparison Image
HDV is from tape 10bit is from FCP+KonaLH capture upper comparison is with blue channel desaturated to show noise. Notice the difference along the fuzzy edge. The 10bit version is better as expected, but both are pretty noisy IMO.
__________________
will griffith producer/editor Last edited by Mike Tiffee; December 1st, 2005 at 04:22 PM. Reason: Fixed URL Code |
|
|
|
December 1st, 2005, 11:58 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. John's, NL, Canada
Posts: 416
|
Looks good for a static comparison. Would really like to see a still comparing 10bit uncompressed to HDV with high motion such as paning with people moving. MPEG 2 fairs really well with static images.
Don't want to start the whole argument of mpeg 2 stuff, just curious to see how well the codec in the camera holds up. So far it seems to be pretty good but a still from high motion would actually allow a more accurate and objective comparison.
__________________
www.engr.mun.ca/~wakeham/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
December 1st, 2005, 12:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
|
I was being nice to HDV. :)
I'll post some next week.
__________________
will griffith producer/editor |
|
|
|
|
December 1st, 2005, 02:05 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. John's, NL, Canada
Posts: 416
|
Its hard to get a good comparison. I think HDV is a good compression format that still has some kinks to work out.
Apperciate the comparison. Wish I had the gear to try and push the codec hard to see what it can do. Sure that it will surprise people a little.
__________________
www.engr.mun.ca/~wakeham/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
