|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 18th, 2010, 05:58 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 156
|
Z1 or FX1E
Hey guys i no you hear this all the time
But i am saving up for a new HD cam, I already had hd100e but i sold it due to the quality of the image. I am looking for either an fx1e or Z1E however i have compared the both and used both of them what are the differences all i could find was that there were xlrs for Z1 and a tiny bit more menu options. With the FX1e the chips are the same, same lens and the image quality is exactly the same, the only thing is the FX1e needs a beachtex adapter but this can only be attached to the bottom of the camera eliminating any tripod shots am i right? which puts me off Hmm anybody got an FX1E or Z1 to pass on advice? Thanks a lot guys for reading Happy Filming :) |
April 18th, 2010, 07:02 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 80
|
Ollie,
Having the Beachtek doesn't eliminate tripod shots. You can mount the tripod plate to the beachtek no problems. I own both cameras, and yes it is much easier to have the XLR on camera, having the Beachtek is not a problem. Comparing the 2 camera, yes there are quite a few menu differences, some of which vary the final picture quality, however, with both cameras on the same picture profile, you will get the same picture quality and you could always do the adjusting later in post for your desired look.
__________________
www.griffinvideoproductions.com.au | Sony Z1 and FX1 | Windows 7 x64 | i7-920 OC 3.6GHZ | 12gb DDR3 | CS5.5 Master Collection |
April 18th, 2010, 07:45 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
__________________
"It can only be attributable to human error... This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error." |
April 19th, 2010, 08:18 PM | #4 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 12
|
I didn't see it mentioned in the other thread, but you have the ability to do free-run time code on the Z1, but not on the FX1. Also if you have multiple cameras you can sync them all together, which makes syncing tracks a breeze (even across tape changes or camera shut downs). Maybe not an issue if you're only shooting with one camera. But could add to the appeal if you go to sell it someday.
|
April 19th, 2010, 08:55 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: thomaston, ct
Posts: 141
|
I use a Rode NTG2 mic with my FX1 and I have to say for the application, I don't see XLR mics being that much better, certainly not enough to justify the almost $1000 dollar price difference.
|
April 22nd, 2010, 12:45 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
I've got both cameras Ollie, and there's no way I'd pick up the FX1 if the Z1 was available. The black stretch, the numerical zoom readout, the XLRs, the menu audio options, the white balance fine tune, the extra assign buttons make the difference in price well worth it in my view. I do like the LP mode in SD on the FX1 though, as this has saved me on long shoots.
tom. |
April 22nd, 2010, 05:16 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 156
|
Thats great what is black stretch exactly. Is to do with more light you can consume
|
April 23rd, 2010, 12:48 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Oh, I forgot focus assist! A huge Z1 improvement over the FX1, and I use it all the time. Also the hours meter on the Z1 lets you know exactly how old the camera is if you're buying second hand.
Black stretch is a menu toggle on/off. Point your Z1 into the sunlit garden and switch black stretch off and that's what the FX1 gives you Note the shadow areas. Now switch it on and magically it will open up those shadows, showing you detail that was just a black hole on the FX1. Ideal at weddings where all the suits wear dark jackets. tom. |
| ||||||
|
|