|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 14th, 2005, 10:52 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 35
|
fx1 new music video
Hello everybody,
we've just finished a no budget music video for a belgian rock band called norma. Here's the link to the video: http://www.theblacksheep.be/temp/norma.mov It was shot with a PAL FX1 in HDV and two PAL Z1. We shot with a shutter of 1/25 (making the picture actually progressive) in low light. We had a tripod and a small Cobra Crane. We did capture with ConnectHD, edited in HDV in Premiere Pro 1.5.1, sfx and color grading in After Effects 6.5. The fake motion control effect/360 shots were done with just a tripod and AfterFX. We hope you'll like it :-) |
June 14th, 2005, 11:26 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 842
|
Nice work!
The lighting look wonderful, very clean pictures. |
June 14th, 2005, 12:22 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 426
|
Hi,
Nice job, On the shots with the panning motion, which look like they are continuous, i assume you did a pan on the tripod, and then in After effects you "stitched' together two separate pans to make them look continuos?? Did you have any of the "Cinema" features turned on in the camera to help achieve the Film look ?? Thanks, Mike moncrief |
June 14th, 2005, 01:19 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
Oliver
Excellent! Great editing work, beautiful footage. Please elaborate on the usage of 1/25 shutter speed. Exactly how does this produce a "progressive" image? Thanks Bob |
June 14th, 2005, 02:26 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 65
|
Nice work Oliver. :-)
|
June 14th, 2005, 06:44 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
|
I take it you guys didnt use motion control, just wondering how you synced it all up?
Cheers, Ben Gurvich |
June 15th, 2005, 10:11 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 127
|
Oliver, really nice editing.
"The fake motion control effect/360 shots were done with just a tripod and AfterFX." I sort of understand how it was done in FX. But how did you get it to be seamless? That's what it looks to me. Thanks, Ray
__________________
junray@yahoo.com |
June 16th, 2005, 05:37 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
Olivier Vanaschen,
Fantastic job! Excellent execution in shots and blending of your material. Absolutely professional work. Michael Pappas |
June 16th, 2005, 06:47 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 853
|
Nice video!
__________________
Shannon W. Rawls ~ Motion Picture Producer & huge advocate of Digital Acquisition. |
June 16th, 2005, 07:38 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boones Mill, Virginia
Posts: 267
|
Really nice! The video is excellent and I really like the song.
|
June 23rd, 2005, 12:28 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 35
|
thanks!!!
thanks a lot everybody for the comments ! Sorry for the late answer, we had a lot of work to finish...
It was a 360 stage. Actually, we did shoot 9 static shots (that did overlap each other a bit) and stiched them together in After Effects to create a huge huge picture (something like 12000px x 1080px) and then did the panning in post. It's exactly the same process as making a panoramic picture in still photography but in video. We asked the band to play the whole song, each member seperately so we could move when we wanted. To make more than one turn, we did stich the 12000px image three times, making a huge 40mpx + composition in AE, pretty heavy rendering :-) Here's a picture of the panoramic video: http://www.theblacksheep.be/temp/norma01.jpg Actually, we did like the look of the 1/25 shutter. We still don't understand how or why it's even progressive (we just looked at the picture in AE and it surely is). This kind of semi-slow shutter helps making the movements smoother,... We won't use everytime but here it did work well. Actually, it shows really when you watch it on TV. Thanks again, the black sheep |
June 23rd, 2005, 02:11 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
-Steve |
|
October 27th, 2005, 11:46 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Olivier, I remember watching your video, and it was great. Try www.HDVawards.org
|
November 6th, 2005, 07:44 AM | #14 |
Tourist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
|
25 Shutter
Olivier,
I am very much interested in this 25 shutter. But I have serious problems when panning, tilting, in general when moving the camera. It is like the picture is blurry or the camera has problems to maintain autofocus. If I can avoid these problems I want to use this shutter speed. Did you notice such problems when shooting??? This shutter speed is easy to prepare lighting. |
November 7th, 2005, 01:57 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 547
|
If I can avoid these problems I want to use this shutter speed.
Typically movies are shot with the shutter at 1/2 the framerate. I.e., 24 fps -> 1/48 s shutter. 30 fps -> 1/60 s shutter. 25 fps -> 1/50 s shutter etc. Having a long shutter will result in extreme motion blur of anything that moves... so any camera motion, shake, zoom will result in your entire image becoming blurry. Since there's very little high-spatial-frequency information in the image, it will be quite difficult for any auto-focus algorithm to pick out a real object to focus on. Therefore, if you really want to shoot with a 1/25 shutter, you should be very careful with camera motion and use manual focus. -Steve |
| ||||||
|
|