|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 27th, 2005, 09:56 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
FX/Z1 rated 9 Lux at telephoto setting
Here's explanation of 6 Lux Japanese rating. The camera rated 3 lux at F1.6. End telephoto range is F2.8, which means about 9 Lux. You get 6 Lux average. This explains why Canon and other makers have higher lux numbers in Japan. The Japanese ratings are lot more honest.
Did anyone check F-stops/lux ratings at various focal lengths? |
April 27th, 2005, 05:15 PM | #2 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
In both cases, the WIDE setting is used. A far more professional spec is lux at F-stop with NO gain. I believe this is a 100IRE level.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
April 27th, 2005, 06:14 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 547
|
Without a signal-to-noise ratio, I fail to see how a lux rating is relevent. Does noise enter into the calculation or not?
-Steve |
April 27th, 2005, 10:19 PM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: san francisco california
Posts: 145
|
You cannot compare lux ratings between manufacturers. At this point there is no standard in lux rating comparisons between each other. Sony's lux is different from Panasonic or Canon lux . To make clear: 1 Sony lux does not equal 1 Canon lux or 1 Panasonic lux. They are all different. You can compare the lux rating of cameras within Sony but that's it.
One way to compare cameras is by the relevance of the f-stops and the footcandles associated with a particular f stop, let's say f/11 at 2,000 footcandles. But dont make the assumption that lux rating is standardized. It is not !!!!! Quote:
|
|
April 27th, 2005, 10:45 PM | #5 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Augusto is quite right. The way the manufacturers have treated lux ratings so differently, it's a spec you can forget. Besides, when in doubt, just add light.
For Steve M. -- great to see you at NAB! Hope to run into you again on your own turf in July for DV Expo East. |
April 27th, 2005, 11:18 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: san francisco california
Posts: 145
|
Thanks, Chris. However, I reread Radek's posting and realized he was aware of the lux rating discrepancies between manufacturers. My apologies.
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|