|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 27th, 2005, 04:56 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
HOT TIP: Canon C-8 Tele 1.4x
For those looking to extend the range of the FX/Z series, the Canon C-8 Teleconverter 1.4x is hard to beat.
see pic http://i18.ebayimg.com/02/i/03/84/be/d4_1_b.JPG This will extend your range from 54 to 75mm but is only useable above the 30mm marking on the zoom scale (partial zoom capable) It was originally made for the Canon 1014XLS sound cine super 8, and thus is 'film glass' quality and is a simple 2 element design with an objective of 100mm and looks impressive on the FX/Z Filter size is 67mm so you will need a 72-67 step down ring A big advantage in terms of 1.4x magnification it also has the benefit that at the same reach of the stock FX/Z lens you only need to zoom in 70% and at that setting the widest aperture is F2 - which means you gain a whole stop I've just bought two and each was less than $50 at your favourite world auction site Now that I've made this public the price may go up - sorry about that but I guess that's life
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
February 28th, 2005, 01:26 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
great tip. how's the image quality? have you used it yet? also have you found any other teleconverters that can work?
|
February 28th, 2005, 12:46 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
February 28th, 2005, 01:04 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 160
|
John,
Are there any compromises since the filter is a 67 and you're using a step down to make it work. |
February 28th, 2005, 01:15 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 160
|
I'm concerned about the red and green shifting going on in the image. Here is a jpg showing my concerns.
The bird looks pretty good though. JPG Version |
February 28th, 2005, 01:36 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
the converter works exactly like on the Canon 1014XLS - over 30mm and youre fine
the fringing - yes - check Matteo Ricchetti's posts on this high contrast edges tend to bleed on the FX/Z - the cure is out there :)
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
April 7th, 2005, 02:51 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
i just bought one off of ebay and it came in today. good advice, this lens looks real solid. the outter rim is 100mm? is there a hood out there for this? can't wait to use it. i feel like i got a good deal. 1.4x canon C-8 for 60 bucks or century 1.6x @ 1000 bucks. hmm......
i am sure that the century lens is a little better but not $940.00 better. thanks joel |
April 8th, 2005, 01:31 AM | #8 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 6
|
What about the 1.6x Teleconverter
Just wondering would the same apply to the 1.6x teleconverters ?
I know $60 isn't a huge amount, but if it's wrong it's $60 wasted as these seem to be the only ones available at the moment. |
April 8th, 2005, 09:28 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
i thiunk the 1.6x converters are 48mm rear threads. so don't even try it.
joel |
April 8th, 2005, 10:50 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
Hey Joel,
welcome to the 75mm HDV club ! A further tip is that Ive just acquired a Sigma VT5 5x (52mm threads solid construction 9 elements and roof prism and multicoated) and I am waiting for some step rings to test it - first impression is that it looks good at the top 25% of the zoom - and thats a whopping 270mm!! (~2000mm 35mm camera equivalent) http://i1.ebayimg.com/02/i/03/c3/99/13_1_b.JPG I will post some pix when the rings arrive Chris, the 1.6x will work but only at about 20% of the top end of the zoom, but if you can find the step rings (48mm is an old size) go for it - the 1.6x has four spectra coated elements. They are quite a bit cheaper ($10-20) which is amazing vfm for film glass.
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
April 8th, 2005, 11:15 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
yes,
please let me know know how that turns out. people are probably thinking that we are stupid trying out these lenes. joel |
April 8th, 2005, 11:17 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
also john,
how much did you pay for that lens? and is that 20 years old like the canon C-8? thanks joel |
April 8th, 2005, 11:35 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
I got the Sigma VT5 in the UK but translates to about $35 plus s/h in mint condition - yes its a golden oldie from the mid 80s
I am waiting on a 67-52 step to try it properly - let you know soon
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
April 8th, 2005, 12:16 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 74
|
What effect will all these thread conversions make? With the lens being further away from the camera lens won't there be some serious barrel distortion?
I am still very curious as to how all this pans out! |
April 8th, 2005, 12:33 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 356
|
great! can't wait to see. please don't forget.
if you need ftp to post pictures let me know i got a ton of space and bandwidth. j |
| ||||||
|
|