|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 471
|
I thought the camera shell was magnesium, as it has been in the PD150 and before that the VX1000 lines?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 55
|
camera does have a magnesium frame inside.
Concerning motion artifacts : is it produces during fast panning of the cam or when you tray to catch fast movements on the set while not moving the cam ?????? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
You'll see artifacts when panning. The slower the cineframe, the worse it becomes. CF24 and CF25 have a great deal of artifacting, but it's not terribly unlike what film does.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 55
|
Doug : so you are saying it is better than ordinary film? If so why is everybody complaining about it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|