FX1 ZEISS-FUJINON lens compare at DVinfo.net

Matteo Ricchetti · January 24th, 2005, 03:08 PM

Now I made a B4 mount adapter besides Nikon on my camera
www.eidomedia.com/hdve here you can find a side by side compare between the original Zeiss lens and the Fujinon without
It is very clear the Chromatic aberation of the Zeiss and the clean images of the Fuji....

Toke Lahti · January 25th, 2005, 05:19 AM

Of course 1/2" lenses that cost as new more than xf1 are better than the original fx1's lens.

It would be very interesting to see how those 1/3" eng-lenses performs.
They are in somewhere 1.5k$ league.

Ivan Hurtado · January 28th, 2005, 09:23 AM

As i am newbe here it will look sort of stupid question. Im still choosing new camera and the three competitors are the Canon, pana and the sony. Last one is increasing gap in the race, but what is iching me is how you took away the Zeiss lens?

As half my family is Still amateur photographers im able to use from nikon to fuji and canon lenses (that´s why the XL2 is there). So, where did you got this universal adapter? and how you put the Nikon lens there?

Being the Zeiss lens for video and the Fuji and Nikon photo lenses the difference amaze me, specially in getting rid of the blue halo. I will wait some time to see more reviews, but in my heart (and pocket) there´s just place for one. Thanks for open m eyes in this little issue.

Maybe i got a winner!

Nick Hiltgen · January 30th, 2005, 04:21 AM

Hey if you REALLY want to compare why not through up some zeiss digiprimes and the new fuji primes I think that will give you a much more balanced view, er so to speak.

January 24th, 2005, 03:08 PM	#1
Matteo Ricchetti Regular Crew Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Italy Posts: 39	FX1 ZEISS-FUJINON lens compare Now I made a B4 mount adapter besides Nikon on my camera www.eidomedia.com/hdve here you can find a side by side compare between the original Zeiss lens and the Fujinon without It is very clear the Chromatic aberation of the Zeiss and the clean images of the Fuji....

January 28th, 2005, 09:23 AM	#3
Ivan Hurtado Regular Crew Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Granada, Spain Posts: 75	As i am newbe here it will look sort of stupid question. Im still choosing new camera and the three competitors are the Canon, pana and the sony. Last one is increasing gap in the race, but what is iching me is how you took away the Zeiss lens? As half my family is Still amateur photographers im able to use from nikon to fuji and canon lenses (that´s why the XL2 is there). So, where did you got this universal adapter? and how you put the Nikon lens there? Being the Zeiss lens for video and the Fuji and Nikon photo lenses the difference amaze me, specially in getting rid of the blue halo. I will wait some time to see more reviews, but in my heart (and pocket) there´s just place for one. Thanks for open m eyes in this little issue. Maybe i got a winner! __________________ IvI

January 25th, 2005, 05:19 AM	#2
Toke Lahti Major Player Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 158	Of course 1/2" lenses that cost as new more than xf1 are better than the original fx1's lens. It would be very interesting to see how those 1/3" eng-lenses performs. They are in somewhere 1.5k$ league.

January 30th, 2005, 04:21 AM	#4
Nick Hiltgen Trustee Join Date: May 2003 Location: Atlanta GA Posts: 1,427	Hey if you REALLY want to compare why not through up some zeiss digiprimes and the new fuji primes I think that will give you a much more balanced view, er so to speak.