|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19th, 2004, 06:47 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 143
|
FX1 VS HDCAM pic
FX1 VS HDCAM
http://www.ohta-studio.net/report/HDCAM/hd_10.html |
October 19th, 2004, 09:11 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Thanks for posting those!
I wonder why they didn't shoot the images simultaneously. The bottom two are obviously taken weeks if not months apart (landscaping is radically different around the buildings). And the top two could have been the same day, but one is in shade and the other in full sun. That would have been a helpful comparison to see how the latitude (dynamic range) is with the FX1. But the camera is quite sharp!
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
October 19th, 2004, 09:21 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
|
You can see in the top pic that the tree branches hanging in the top are completely changed - a whole different season as well.
|
October 19th, 2004, 10:29 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 61
|
I plugged in some different numbers at the end of that URL and if you plug in hd_8.html, you get a page with more HDCAM pics but no FX1 pix. I'm assuming they had the HDCAM awhile ago and just went out and tried to recreate some of the same shots with the FX1.
|
| ||||||
|
|