|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 18th, 2004, 11:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
FX1 vs HDCAM 730 camera pics link!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
T his is a link to a person who shot tests with the FX1 vs the HDCAM 730 highDef camera.
http://www.ohta-studio.net/report/FX1/testFX1.html |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004, 12:51 PM
|
#2 |
|
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Very interesting, but I now want to see stuff in low light, even some blacks.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
|
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004, 07:28 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 165
|
Wow, the frames from both cameras look REALLY bad. I hope that's just a web compression issue, and not how the actual frame looks.
|
|
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004, 09:28 PM
|
#4 |
|
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
I thought it looked good.
hwm
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
|
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004, 11:30 PM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
I did too! I downloaded the full 1920x1080 frames and then looked at them on a HD monitor an in PS. Looks very good
|
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2004, 12:16 AM
|
#6 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 667
|
Here is a link to the HDR FX1 test images vs the HDCAM 730 at my site.
http://www.pbase.com/pappasartshd I also have pics of The Pansonic P2 HD camcorder if some of you have never seen it. |
|
|
|
|
October 19th, 2004, 07:17 AM
|
#7 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 165
|
Well, they don't look as bad on this computer. But they do have compression artifacts. I'm sure that's just because of the JPEG compression though.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
