|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 7th, 2004, 06:08 AM | #121 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 437
|
I don't think we'll see any footage from that camera for a while. The display model was a mock-up, which means it was solid inside...no electronics. Just for show, under glass.
We wont see a Canon anytime soon, since Canon gets its electronics from Sony. It'll be a while before we have another camera but JVC to choose from in the HDV arena. |
April 7th, 2004, 07:01 AM | #122 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
|
|
April 7th, 2004, 07:56 AM | #123 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
If the top "panel" behind the mic is another LCD flip out screen, I'd be HAPPY!
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
April 14th, 2004, 11:24 PM | #124 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 47
|
It's not actually an "additional" screen... it's the main LCD screen. As on the VX2100, the screen is on the side and the DV tape deck is on the other side where your hand goes. On this one, the LCD is moved to the front of the handle, the DV deck is moved to the left side so you don't have to remove your holding hand to switch tapes.
Also somebody mentioned earlier in this post that the 1, 2, 3 buttons might be focus presets? More likely, they are user memory buttons for camera settings (included would be white balance, shutter speed, iris, possibly mic levels, etc.). (This is all speculation since the final product hasn't been introduced, but this is what can be gathered from numerous pictures I, along with others, have seen) Anyway, I'm excited... looks like it'll be a solid product and it looks even more refined and user friendly than the current VX2100/PD-170. |
April 15th, 2004, 12:22 AM | #125 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 932
|
> Anyway, I'm excited... looks like it'll be a solid product and it
> looks even more refined and user friendly than the current > VX2100/PD-170. Hmm. I am sure it will be a very interesting product. I am also shure there is no way it will have the sensitivity to light that the VX2100/PD170 have. Also, it does not seem to feature XLR connectors so for demanding audio applications we will have to add some extra hardware not needen on cameras desgined for pro use like the PD150/170, PDX10, etc. Let's hope Sony at least allows line level audio input in camera mode, then we could add a good preamp or mixer. I have a hunch that there might be two of these cameras in the works, one if the prototyped one, the other one having perhaps XLR inputs, maybe a better lens or some other feature to make it more appealing to professional videographers.
__________________
Ignacio Rodríguez in the third world. @micronauta on Twitter. Main hardware: brain, eyes, hands. |
April 15th, 2004, 07:31 AM | #126 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 47
|
Yeah, you're probably correct about the light level sensitivety... it'll probably take a little while for the high def CCD's to catch up to the low light performance of the current VX2100 performance. On the XLR's, though... the prototype is labeled with a "DSR" which implies that it is the consumer version (no XLR's). There will probably be a "PD" version that adds XLR's... and at least $1500 to the price tag (booo!). The prototype did, however, have external audio level controls on the back side, which is definitely a good sign. The overall layout of the camera just seems to be very refined.
Well, I guess we've all got only a couple more days to find out the official details! |
April 16th, 2004, 08:18 AM | #127 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 26
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Pasty Jackson : On the XLR's, though... the prototype is labeled with a "DSR" which implies that it is the consumer version (no XLR's). There will probably be a "PD" version that adds XLR's... and at least $1500 to the price tag (booo!). -->>>
Actually, DSR is the prefix for their professional cameras, like the DSR-PD150. Their consumer versions are DCR - like DCR-VX1000, DCR-TRVXXX etc.
__________________
David Sheneman Rockford, IL |
April 16th, 2004, 08:47 AM | #128 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
David is quite right -- the designation "DSR" would imply that it actually does have built-in XLR connectors. Hope this helps,
|
April 16th, 2004, 05:44 PM | #129 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 932
|
The mock-up seen also had the Handycam logo stenciled on it's body... and there are no Handycams with XLR connectors, it's their consumer brand. Also... I don't see there being any space for XLR connectors.
__________________
Ignacio Rodríguez in the third world. @micronauta on Twitter. Main hardware: brain, eyes, hands. |
April 16th, 2004, 06:36 PM | #130 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Some of the photos of this camera said "DSR 0000" others did not. Some had a "3 CCD" decal, others did not. Let's face it, until Sony actually announces something this is just vaporware...
|
April 19th, 2004, 01:49 AM | #131 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,483
|
So what's the reasoning that it won't have the
light sensitivity of the VX/PD? |
April 19th, 2004, 08:40 AM | #132 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
There is something to be said about the VX2100 and PD170 with their relatively low pixel count (340k video actual) and 1/3" CCDs in regards to low light performance. |
|
April 19th, 2004, 12:03 PM | #133 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 444
|
Re: "There is something to be said about the VX2100 and PD170 with their relatively low pixel count (340k video actual) and 1/3" CCDs in regards to low light performance."
And that thing to be said is, "for a fat girl you don't sweat too much." |
April 19th, 2004, 02:35 PM | #134 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 932
|
> "for a fat girl you don't sweat too much."
Jajjaja, that's, well, sort of the nail on the head. I don't think the pixel size/light sensitivity ratio can get any better than that of the Sony VX2100/PD170. At twice the resolution I presume the CCD would have to be four times the size to have the same low light performance. Probably this is why JVC is going CMOS, not CCD, for their pro HDV offering.
__________________
Ignacio Rodríguez in the third world. @micronauta on Twitter. Main hardware: brain, eyes, hands. |
April 20th, 2004, 09:32 PM | #135 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 50
|
This baby has XLR connections... YES!!!
I am buying this camera as soon as it comes out!
|
| ||||||
|
|