|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 26th, 2008, 08:38 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
|
Using z1 as a deck
Hey guys i fear im wearing the heads on my Z1 down as im using it as a deck to capture anything shot on HDV. A HD deck is too expensive, as i only shoot 40% HDV i dont want to go down that route yet. Just wondering what the alternatives are? Would a small HDV consumer camcorder do the job, something like this Sony HDR-HC3E HDV Camcorder PAL? Or would i loose quality when capturing? What do you guys use? Cheers.
|
August 26th, 2008, 09:42 AM | #2 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
|
|
August 26th, 2008, 11:05 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
|
Thanks Martyn. anyone else just using a consumer camcorder?
|
August 26th, 2008, 11:14 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Martyn's right, any camcorder that replays HDV successfully (ie doesn't crumple the tape) will do just fine, and you'll transfer the file without loss or change or addition.
But look, I've never heard of anyone wearing out their Z1 heads and using it as a replay deck shouldn't worry you in the slightest. In fact I'd go so far as to say that you'll have replaced the Z1 for something more up to date long before you wear its heads out - so I use mine in this mode a lot. tom. |
August 26th, 2008, 01:39 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
|
Maybe, but it will dirty the heads.
|
August 26th, 2008, 01:43 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
A brand new tape fresh from the wrapping can clog the heads, so that's no argument. Heads are easy to clean.
|
August 27th, 2008, 09:00 PM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I have used my z1 to capture all the footage I've shot with it. I got the camera in June, 2005 and it's still going strong with no problems.
Your mileage may vary. |
August 28th, 2008, 02:41 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 611
|
I concur the heads wearing out isn't an issue. A Z1 is designed for constant professional use. There are lots of other areas more likely to go long (the lens backfocus, the viewfinder) before the heads "wear out".
One thing that using the camera as a deck MIGHT do (this is just an intuitive guess on my part, I've no evidence of this) is the back and forth of batch capture, the constant fast-winding, rewinding and cueing up might strain the motor, but again, I've never actually heard d of anyone who has damaged their camera in this way, and I know quite a few DV filmmakers who use their shooting cameras as decks. |
August 28th, 2008, 08:05 PM | #9 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Quote:
My theory is that the practice of logging clips before capturing was likely because of incredibly expensive storage costs. Now with hard drives costing so little, there's no reason not to capture it all. I agree with Boyd that the chances of you wearing out your camera before you want to upgrade it anyway are pretty slim. I use mine to capture everything shot in HDV, and a cheaper consumer camera to capture DV. That cheap camera, by the way, must have a million hours on its heads and still going strong. |
|
August 28th, 2008, 09:06 PM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Quote:
No question it's really boring and causes a lot of tape drive wear to go through each tape marking in and out points. But the alternative is worse, in my mind. I can't imagine how difficult it would have been to manage 4TB of raw footage to make a 15-minute DVD. The HC3s I used for capture were hot enough to fry an egg at the end of the day. Frame accuracy isn't an issue in capture... I tell Premiere to add 5 second handles to the head and tail of each clip. |
|
August 28th, 2008, 09:50 PM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Absolutely, Adam. I agree completely that your situation is better handled with logging beforehand. I work in events with a 3:1 ratio, so capturing entire tapes works better.
As for frame accuracy, I'm more concerned with RE-capturing an already completed project. If, for some reason, you have to revisit an old project, I'm much more comfortable recapturing a few tapes as opposed to hundreds of clips from a sequence. |
August 28th, 2008, 11:23 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
That's a good point. I think, though, that you could unlink and recapture with most NLEs with Batch Capture, which should let you just insert the tape and get a cup of coffee while it does its stuff.
I think... at least I hope so... |
August 29th, 2008, 05:25 AM | #13 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Quote:
Anyway, we're a little bit away from the original question. To answer Dennis, even a consumer grade camera will be fine for capturing. No quality loss with digital video formats. But he could use his Z1 with no worries as well, and will probably get more frame accurate capture. |
|
| ||||||
|
|