|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 8th, 2008, 12:24 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 80
|
BeachTek excellent experience
Just wanted to share with you guys.
Just got off the phone with them, they have a new one for $249 and $190 for refurbished one. Both have same 1 year warranty. Free shipping. I got the refurbished one since the warranty is same for $190 total. Btw, they mentioned that it's now discontinued. Regards, KC. |
February 8th, 2008, 12:51 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Should clarify that the specific unit you are referring to is the DXA-FX, which has been replaced by the DXA-4. The refurbed FXes are the same price as the new 4s, and in fact the 4 is $10 cheaper at B&H than at the Beachtek online store. Also, the 4 now adds an AUX mini-plug input which the FX lacks. They are almost identical in size and shape, with the FX version being about 1/4" narrower, according to the specs at B&H. It also appears that the FX is powered, while the 4 is not.
|
February 8th, 2008, 01:03 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 80
|
yeah
forgot to mention, it was a dxa-fx I purchased.
however it's not replaced by dxa-4, dxa-4 is an older one and simplier, the one you are referring to is called different. and by the way, b&h sells dxa-fx for more than bt store. I only used dxa-4 before until left channel got shot, let's see the difference once I get the fx unit. |
February 8th, 2008, 01:19 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Yes, B&H wants considerably more for the FX than if you buy it from Beachtek directly, but the 4 (as I noted) is cheaper at B&H if that's the adapter you want.
I bought the 4 because I wanted the AUX input, just in case. Just arrived yesterday so I haven't had a chance to try it out yet. Other features seem to be identical, although I suppose they do work differently inside. I think you're right that the 4 predates the FX, but by replaced I meant that this is now the model BT recommends for the FX1, as the FX is no longer being made and the DXA-4 is. So maybe we should just say that the 4 *outlasted* the FX.... |
February 8th, 2008, 01:39 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 80
|
no
he recommended me another model which he quoted around $400 for.
|
February 9th, 2008, 09:32 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milford, MA
Posts: 487
|
I bought the other model that he recommended (DXA-6A HD), the top of the line BeachTek. I was initially going to buy the refurb. The HD model, while more expensive, does have it's own pre-amps, bypassing the noisier ones built into the camera. The sound is very clean.
|
February 28th, 2008, 01:46 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 69
|
We shoot with an FX-1 and an HC-7 will that one work on the HC-7 also?
Thanks! Bill |
February 29th, 2008, 02:45 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 89
|
I have a DXA-6, as new, in box, which I no longer need.
Dugi. |
March 1st, 2008, 12:27 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 69
|
|
March 1st, 2008, 02:36 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 89
|
Not sure what you mean Bill.
HD? Its a BeachTek DXA-6 Dual Phantom Power Adapter. Quote: Two balanced XLR inputs Dual 48v phantom power Auxiliary mini-jack input Trim Controls MIC/LINE input switches MONO/STEREO output switch Ground switch Uses one 9 volt battery http://beachtek.com/dxa6.html Dugi. |
March 1st, 2008, 03:00 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 69
|
They have a new HD model that has been highly recommended. I do not know enough about all this yet to be sure of the differences :-(
Thanks! Bill |
| ||||||
|
|