|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 21st, 2007, 01:23 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
25p question - it looks interlaced!
I have created a 1080i25 project with 25p footage from my V1 in Premiere Pro.
I output the file as a 1080i25 AVI without selecting the 'de-interlace' option. For the first time I can view the footage on my new High Definition monitor, and I can now see interlaced lines in this apparent 25p footage. I've attached some screenshots. They're not re-sized, I've just cropped the edges. What you see here is the exact pixels from my footage with clear interlaced lines. If you look closely at the edges they are obvious. Can someoene tell me what I've done wrong in the workflow? I record 25p, I capture into a 25i project and create a 25i AVI, right? This is what I have been told repeatedly to do. Because the 25p footage is imbedded in an interlaced stream, right? Do I need to de-interlace afterall? |
April 21st, 2007, 01:42 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
John,
1. The 25PsF from the V1 is embedded within a 1080/50i stream, with 2 fields per each frame, but without any temporal difference between them (while interlaced video also has 2 fields, but taken 1/50 sec aprat). 2. With Premiere, you can use the 1080/25 (50i) template (not 25i), but when exporting, you need to choose field order "none" (progressive). However, you do not switch deintelacing on. 3. Why would you want an uncompressed HD avi, anyway? It's best to use MPG-2! Hope this helps. PS. I can't see any screenshots attached:)
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive Last edited by Piotr Wozniacki; April 21st, 2007 at 02:20 AM. |
April 22nd, 2007, 01:58 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
MPG-2?
Really? Gees, I'm behind with my knowedge. How can MPEG be better than uncompressed? What are the optimal settings for that? I've added the screenshots but you were right with your solution. The lines are gone. However, the file is almost 100Mb smaller than the original and I reckon that I can see a quality degradation in all the footage. Is that possible or am I imagining it? |
April 22nd, 2007, 02:04 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
John,
Whether you use uncompressed avi or compress to mpeg depends on your intended use of the resulting file. Uncompressed can be used for easier editing (as proxy files, usually of lower resolution), but if you are going to deliver as full HD, you must compress it somehow!
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
April 22nd, 2007, 02:11 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
And to do so, I need to use the Adobe Media Encoder, right? I hate navigating the settings on that thing. MPEG2 doesn't even allow me to output in Full HD, it forces me to compress to SD. |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 02:21 AM | #6 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
Also, encoding as MPEG-2 does not imply going SD at all. You can define your frame size as 1440x1080 or 1920x1080, and your bitrate accordingly.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 02:40 AM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
You're right, I've just discovered that! But I'm always dissatisfied with the results of MPEG conversion. Also, do you advise choosing the 1080 25p option for output or 50i? And what is the recommended BitRate? Should I force it to be as high as possible? |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 03:33 AM | #8 | ||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
So, rendering to avi will only have one possible use: if your system is not robust enough, it will make editing easier. But it will never bring back the quality lost due to the mpeg compression! Quote:
BTW, I'd appreciate a comment from somebody more knowledgeable: with VBR, does it really make sense to set the max bitrate any higher than 25?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
||
April 22nd, 2007, 04:04 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Thaks very much for all your advice and help - one last question though - when I caupture from my V1 into PPro 1.5.1 I get an AVI rather than an mpg or m2t. Does that mean that I am doing something other than the usual way?
|
April 22nd, 2007, 04:13 AM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
-are you shooting SD or HD? -if you're shooting HD, and getting avi's at capture, you're capturing SD! Check in the camera menu whether you have i.Link Conv ON; if so turn it OFF -if your PP 1.5 can even see the camera with i.Link Conv OFF, you need to upgrade your PP to support HD!
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 04:21 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
|
|
April 22nd, 2007, 04:50 AM | #12 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
Anybody?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 04:53 AM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Should I worry that my footage is compromised because of this? |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 05:05 AM | #14 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
If it is HD avi indeed, and you're capturing without any "special treatment" (like Cineform intermadiates) - than it beats me.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
April 22nd, 2007, 05:25 AM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
That said, it also lists the compression codec as Cineform, though I am under the impression PPro 1.5.1 uses Cineform natively, I certainly don't have anything like Aspect HD installed. |
|
| ||||||
|
|