|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 14th, 2007, 09:07 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Posts: 13
|
Circular Polarizing Filter?
I purchased a 62mm circular polarizing filter (formatt) and it won't fit with the V1U standard lens shade.
Does anyone have an inexpensive suggestion I'm guessing no shade will present some issues and not ready for a matte box expenditure. Thanks Bob |
March 14th, 2007, 09:32 PM | #2 |
Great DV dot com
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 78
|
This is true of the z1u design too, can't really use filters easily. Also, a circular polarizing filter is the wrong choice for video -- you need a non-circular polarizer for best performance. But that doesn't solve the design problem.
__________________
John Jackman www.johnjackman.com |
March 15th, 2007, 01:26 AM | #3 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
Quote:
cheers Gareth |
||
March 15th, 2007, 08:04 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
I came across an article that said that the circular polarizers aren't needed very often because the method of auto-focus that needs that isn't as common. I tested my VX2000 and it is fine with a regular polarizer.
I HIGHLY suggest that people with moderate budgets look into the Cokin filter system. The Cokin P fits just fin on 72mm cameras and the filters range from dirt cheap up to about $150. I got my glass polarizer for about $40. It fits in a special slot in the filter holder that allows it to rotate. There are also hoods available. I think it will be just fine to use filters from 35mm cameras as HD is far below the resolution of 35mm. I can't convey how simple this system is to use. It is very much like a standard mattebox system for under $100 including polarizer and a gradual ND filter. I got the rigid square lens shades and they do a decent job. They can be stacked to make them deeper. Don't forget to get a drop-in lens cap and filter carrier if you get a few filters. I got a couple of gradual ND filters and plan to get some blank/clear filters for protecting the lens and some solid ND for really bright days when I don't want to use the polarizer. |
March 16th, 2007, 05:50 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
try tightening a bit more
Quote:
Later, we tightened it a bit more and suddenly the crazy almost useless thing slid over it! I swear I had it tight the first time, but .... try a little tighter...you never know... BTW, we could reach it to adjust it's angle by very carefully reaching inside and spinning it. A pencil eraser or little stick would work great, but only very carefully. |
|
March 16th, 2007, 01:05 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
I think you're right. It's a misconception that linear polarisers won't work with autofocus systems. I think it's SLR autofocus systems that are generally the problem with linear polarisers.
|
March 16th, 2007, 02:52 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
FYI, I'm using a Hoya Pro1 Digital circular polarizer, which has a low profile frame and fits with the lens hood attached.
I recall being surprised many years ago when I heard that these were being called circular polarizers, since it implies that they're simply quarter wave plates, which they're not (they're linear polarizers with a quarter wave plate bonded to them). |
March 18th, 2007, 09:18 AM | #8 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: london
Posts: 20
|
Circ Pols - Provide more control but are not great in auto mode
Hi guys,
Just been back from shooting in a very hot country. With many dark faces giving back very hard hits of specular reflection in the highlights, the circular polariser gave me the option to turn up or turn down the level of cut I was getting out of the filter, so travelling without a light kit the circ pol provided some much needed extra control. I know this is very specific but in general I have worked with fixed pols and circ pols on these little cams, and if you are running manual focus and have time on the fly to set the filter, I cannot a see any reason to go a stright polariser as somtimes the full filter effect is just too much for the sake of naturalism. However if your going to be on the move and need some autofocus moments then the circular can be tricky, so i'd stay clear. Thnks also for the info on lower profiled filters as the nonfit issue is a real pain. Well thats my little contribution. Good luck with your choices. Nick |
March 18th, 2007, 02:55 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
I use the slim hoya filter on a FX1 too. I choosed it because the low profile that allow to keep the original sunshade.
I made a slot with a cutter into a corner of the sunshade and put a wheel that allow me to rotate the filter inside the sunshade. it was tricky since i was cutting blind into the sunshade and was afraide to damage the mechanism allowing to close the sunshade. it appears that you can cut a small slot into the bottom rigth corner of the sunshade (when looking inside the sunshade from the rear) Since it is plastic, you can easily glue an axis to keep the wheel pressing the edge of the filter. I used a glue for PVC that "melt" low density plastic. The wheel is a very thin metallic one and i glued on it (cyanoacrylate glue) a piece of rubber cut from an o-ring http://www.giroud2.com/divers/pola1.jpg http://www.giroud2.com/divers/pola2.jpg http://www.giroud2.com/divers/pola3.jpg it does not look really nice (it was a first prototype) but it is very efficient with minimal impact on the camera. |
March 18th, 2007, 03:36 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
Even if its possible it makes no sense as polar filter has to be turned around to get the effect. Without the slot mentioned above, polar cannot be used with the sunshade.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
|
March 18th, 2007, 03:40 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
I own this matte box, pretty good, comes with French flag and you can also use Cokins polar filter in it. You may check it out here: http://cokin.com/ico6-mattebox.html
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
|
March 18th, 2007, 07:28 PM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: london
Posts: 20
|
Matte Box looks good
Hi again,
This matte looks good... how much was it? Nick |
March 19th, 2007, 07:00 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
It was 349,- Euro plus VAT in a kit containing a couple of filters, too.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
March 20th, 2007, 11:57 AM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
I can reach the filter from the front!
Quote:
|
|
March 20th, 2007, 06:56 PM | #15 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
"Without the slot mentioned above, polar cannot be used with the sunshade."
I wouldn't say you can't use a polarizer, but it is very inconvenient. I really like that device you made, Zsolt! |
| ||||||
|
|