|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 11th, 2007, 07:53 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 27
|
Shoot me down if this sounds crazy!!
Firstly I am completely new at this HDV game and since I have one of those fated V1E Sony jobbies, I was wondering if the following would give the same results as shooting in 25p mode.
OK here goes, shoot in 50i capture into FCP and edit accordingly then export back to the camera (which is nice and quick) final footage. Then use HD Connect to import using the de interlace and 25p to 24p converter to end up with 24p or 25p footage minus any in camera glitches. Well I have probably caused a great laugh out there but I have noticed for quick playback options I have exported my finished material back to th camera so I can take it along to varous peoples houses and either play in HDV if they have the kit or just regular composite no real rendering times needed. But then if a 25/24p version was needed use the HD Connect on the finished material. ????? BTW I have a little HC3 for this. Steve |
February 11th, 2007, 10:14 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
If I understand corectly what you did, the HDV compression will affect the picture quality twice in this case.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
February 11th, 2007, 10:25 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
There is no point in rendering for the print back to tape. CineForm can import the file straight from the HDD...But as Zsolt points out, you'll be recompressing the tape twice. You're MUCH better off importing using the CineForm codec to begin with, and working from there.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
February 11th, 2007, 10:55 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San José, Costa Rica
Posts: 52
|
Not to mention you are generating interlaced video and not progressive, meaning you are wasting your processing capabilities to deinterlace it later, knowing you can do it natively on the cam....
|
February 11th, 2007, 11:16 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 27
|
OK thanks all,
I have one more question would there be any real difference if I shot 50i and converted it to 25p after it was edited, over shooting 25p onboard, I understand Federico's comments but would there be any real difference in the final look. I have noticed that shooting in 25p has to have more of a controlled handling of the camera where 50i can be more rough. Sorry of this all sounds so very basic. |
February 11th, 2007, 09:19 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
What is the visual difference between 50i > 25p vs "native" 25p (lets take 25p as flawless in this theoretical case)? This might involve more processing and time but would provide a workaround for V1E users.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
|
February 12th, 2007, 08:50 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 27
|
Zsolt,
Thanks for the comments, Like I said I am very new to all this and have a bit of time on my hands before I shoot my first short film, I am waiting on my SGPro and cant wait to get started on my project. But I would like to iron out any miss conceptions I may have with HDV and "That Film Look" scenario first, if I can, esspecially as my Cam may have a problem with 25p native recording.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark II, 24-105mm F4L, 50mm F1.4, 16-35mm F2.8L Flash 580EXII Manfrotto 701HDV Tripod. Apple Mac Pro Dual 3Ghz + 4Gig Apple Cinema display 23" |
| ||||||
|
|