|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 11th, 2006, 12:37 PM | #61 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 11
|
Simon,
If you can find this scenario replicating itself in other screen grabs then I would think you have brought light to some serious issues with the camera. I am thankful for the people like you that are sharing their findings. Hopefully Sony's progressive scanning will not prove to be inferior. I think it sounds promising that DSE has not seen a loss in quality on his end. |
October 11th, 2006, 12:48 PM | #62 | |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Quote:
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
|
October 11th, 2006, 01:24 PM | #63 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 14
|
Viewing full resolution
Hi DSE,
You mentioned needing a monitor over 30" to see full 1920x1080, but I know for sure that both the Apple 23" and the Dell 24" computer LCD monitors, while not showing proper gamma, will show exact 1:1 detail of an 1080i HD image. So for detail viewing, they are great. I own the Dell and it is showing full resolution. Thanks for all of your postings. We are so much the better for it. -Christopher |
October 11th, 2006, 01:29 PM | #64 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Thanks Doug. Okay you may be right about the scaling. Even still the resolution drop was still very apparent on that monitor. And as you have concurred, there is definitely something wrong with the image.
Quote:
When I received the camera the weather was terrible and I couldn't go out and about to try it out, so I apologise for the following shots. They were taken very quickly literally minutes after I took delivery of it. So don't take them as an example of my testing!!!! But regardless of the crap subject matter and piss poor composition, take a look at the detail The brickwork on the garage and house for example. http://www.simonwyndham.co.uk/Sony%2...interlaced.png http://www.simonwyndham.co.uk/Sony%2...iorProscan.png Quote:
|
||
October 11th, 2006, 01:34 PM | #65 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
|
|
October 11th, 2006, 01:43 PM | #66 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
as I said with the previous two grabs: the quality loss too evident for Sony to not have been noticed, or pretend it's not there. This particular camery must be faulty, as simple as that.
Thank you Simon very much for your effort; I can imagine how disappointed you must be with the camera and - with all this discussion going on, where some people don't see the obvious - I share your frustration. But you know what? I think the good news is that - like I said - it's too bad to be there in the final product. Let's hope so! |
October 11th, 2006, 01:48 PM | #67 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Thanks Piotr.
Funnily enough though I am not dissapointed with the camera. If this is an issue I am sure Sony will sort it out, so these shots are only my findings with the camera that I had. In all other respects I liked the camera a lot. But for my full findings you'll need to read Showreel :) |
October 11th, 2006, 01:53 PM | #68 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
|
|
October 11th, 2006, 01:53 PM | #69 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 451
|
Is there anyway with your conacts with Sony or Douglas' contacts we could get to the bottom of this?
It would be nice to close the subject with fact rather than conjecture. Cheers TT |
October 11th, 2006, 01:57 PM | #70 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
|
|
October 11th, 2006, 01:59 PM | #71 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 451
|
Quote:
Call me cynical....! But that doesn't ring quite true because the 24p of the V1U doesn't suffer the same fate. TT |
|
October 11th, 2006, 02:07 PM | #72 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
The data in the picture is the data in the picture. No more, no less. This isn't an analogue capture where filters etc can be used, HDV is a bit for bit transfer over firewire. And as I have mentioned before, 25p does not have the same special requirements that 24p does. I work with 25p footage all the time (pretty much exclusively actually). As I have mentioned before on this thread on more than one occasion, the softness in the progressive mode was very apparent when viewed live from the camera on a high def monitor, let alone after capture. This is a camera issue. Not a NLE one, or something that I may have done. There simply isn't anything that I *could* do on capture and display of this footage that would cause this result. |
|
October 11th, 2006, 02:14 PM | #73 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
OK guys...I think this particular horse has been beaten to death.
There is obviously something not explicable at this time regarding how the V1E is seeing the differences between progressive and interlaced captures. Neither Steve Mullen or myself have seen this with the V1U. All camcorders tested are pre-production units without regard to how "complete" they may or may not be. Simon is a professional cameraman, I'd consider myself in that same category although I'm primarily an editor, I spend a LOT of time behind the lens as well, particularly in Xtreme sports. Trying to suggest that Simon doesn't know what he's doing is non-productive; he's got credits and chops that are exceptionally respectable. Let's table this discussion for now, and wait til we have closer-to-finished camcorders with which to have a truly informed discussion/dialog.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
| ||||||
|
|