|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 9th, 2008, 02:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: upper hunter, australia
Posts: 1,410
|
4:3 safe in 16:9
am shooting a series of short info tapes for a client who's been very specific with his requirements: he wants 16:9 but shot for 4:3 release. i have the 4:3 guides turned on, but i presume i'm seeing the whole frame, ie, no safe area for overscan?
would you advise also turning on the safe area markers for top and bottom of frame and guessing side? leslie |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2008, 08:52 AM
|
#2 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jkt, ID
Posts: 19
|
I also would like to know the answer. :)
Normally, our team do 16:9 shooting, all the way to finish. While authoring, we choose 4:3 by choose letter box (75%, top/bottom cut). We keep all files in 16:9 in case in future the customer want to author in 16:9 for their new TV (which eventually will be 16:9 LCD). Who knows the technology can up-scale our SD-PAL to 1080i in better way. So far all in SD, and we still struggling to adopt HDV (1080/50i). Agatha |
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2008, 05:38 AM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: upper hunter, australia
Posts: 1,410
|
bump.
would really appreciate other opinions on this. leslie |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
