|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 24th, 2009, 11:28 AM | #61 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Jose, CA,, USA
Posts: 144
|
|
September 27th, 2009, 01:35 AM | #62 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lexington, Ky - USA
Posts: 552
|
Pretty excited
Just had to tell someone, I am ordering my second HD1000u this week when B&H re-opens and am pretty psyched about it. I am also ordering a pelican case (1640) so they can both be in the same case. Very excited....
__________________
3x-HD1000u - Ikan 8000HD- custom i7 PC - Vegas Pro 13 and 11 64 bit - Premiere Pro CS4 - and a whole mess of other equipment... |
September 29th, 2009, 04:00 PM | #63 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jenkinsburg,GA.
Posts: 39
|
Hope you enjoy!
Ever think about supplementing with the Sony HDR-HC9? It's got the exact same innards, yet about $900 less. Might be a good second camera choice...
|
September 29th, 2009, 05:01 PM | #64 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lexington, Ky - USA
Posts: 552
|
In this case, I am purchasing it to use for a specific client and the body counts. I actually picked up some extra work specifically to cover this expense, so I am not too worried about the $900 extra. After this purchase, I hope to upgrade to an i7 system and get a primera bravo II, then my next focus is to transition to EX3's within the next 1-1.5 yrs but we will see where it all goes...
For now, I am psyched to be getting another HD1000U.
__________________
3x-HD1000u - Ikan 8000HD- custom i7 PC - Vegas Pro 13 and 11 64 bit - Premiere Pro CS4 - and a whole mess of other equipment... |
October 8th, 2009, 08:44 AM | #65 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 81
|
I have three Sony's, and the HC9 is an excellent third camera for me.
I think it delivers a better image than the HD1000u. I don't really know why, but stuff out of the HC9 looks better (the HC9 is a newer model, the HD1000u is more like a HC7, I think). And the HC9 is a quieter camera than the HD1000u. The HD1000u has a hollow plastic body and the zoom makes noise (I hardly use it these days). But you have to be careful not to tap on the body of the camera with your fingers. If you're using a shotgun, that sound can be picked up. Strategic use of the soft side of velcro can help dampen such sounds. My "A" camera is the FX1000, which is serving me very well. But here's a real advantage to the HC9: size! On a recent shoot, I was able to get that camera into a place that would have thrown me out with anything bigger. I always carry the HC9 for flexibility. You can look like a consumer and shoot like a prosumer with the HC9. |
October 8th, 2009, 11:32 AM | #66 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
|
October 28th, 2009, 12:50 PM | #67 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 81
|
I think that the HC9 has peaking and the HD1000U does not. I'll have to check that out. I've been using the HD1000U for a game show I've been shooting and it is great to have the two shoes for a light and my wireless, but the image out of my FX1000 is far better of course.
|
October 28th, 2009, 02:17 PM | #68 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Excellent catch! The HC9 does indeed have peaking, which neither the HC7 nor the HD1000 do.
|
October 28th, 2009, 03:38 PM | #69 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
There were several minor feature changes/improvements on the HC9 over the HC7 when released, and while it's hard to know exactly WHY, the HC9 did seem to produce slightly better image quality - probably minor firmware tweaks...
|
November 2nd, 2009, 03:07 PM | #70 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: POLAND
Posts: 2
|
|
| ||||||
|
|