|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 30th, 2008, 09:48 PM | #76 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
Thanks. But what are is the thread size of the front of the wide angle converter?
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
January 31st, 2008, 04:51 PM | #77 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
|
There are no threads on the front of the conversion lens. The poorly written instructions recommend not to put additional filters on it. You could probably use a clamp-on filter holder that fits 68 to 70mm lenses.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation |
February 6th, 2008, 04:51 PM | #78 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 57
|
I had to choose between an hd1000 (1800 euro) and a XM2 (2000 euro)
Okay the last one is smaller and doesn't look as fancy, and hasn't got HD, but I think the disadvantages stop there, am I right?
__________________
XM2, Manfrotto 055XDB 128Lp _Student Film_ |
February 8th, 2008, 01:37 PM | #79 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
I just got my HD1000. Never used a shoulder mount camera so it is something to get used to (any hints/suggestions would be great). Went out and did some quick test footage with everything set on auto http://www.everythinginhd.com/pages/sonyHD1000test.html. For looking at the footage it seems very similar to my Canon HV20. Also tried my Canon wide angle converter (WD-43) and it seems to work fine.
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
February 9th, 2008, 01:51 AM | #80 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beer Sheva
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
can you please check what we all looking for? a brife shoot on a dance floor with a LED video light on camera or a 30-40w video light? and post the footage? |
|
February 9th, 2008, 05:51 AM | #81 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 57
|
Sorry but I think nearly every camera above 500 euro can produce such image nowadays, think you can only judge it uncompressed
__________________
XM2, Manfrotto 055XDB 128Lp _Student Film_ |
February 15th, 2008, 03:42 PM | #82 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
February 25th, 2008, 07:33 PM | #83 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
Went to a car event with the HD1000. Still takes some getting used to and keeping it still. But overall very happy with it. The battery life is amazing (used a Impact version of the MP-F770). Used the digital zoom, I know not the best, and it worked good. Next purchase though will be a Telephoto Converter.
Here is the video from the event http://www.speedandmotion.com/pages/...dyevent08.html
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
March 8th, 2008, 11:53 AM | #84 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 2
|
Hvr-hd1000
This site is a rookies dream.I had many questions about the HVR-HD1000 that have now be settled after watching the posted videos. I am looking to use the cam for a local cable talk show on a budget. I believe I will be okay. Thanks guys.
|
March 13th, 2008, 09:42 AM | #85 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17
|
Pan Blur
Is it possible to pan at all with this camera. Or is this a HDV thing, when I pan the images blurs. Well just got mine yesterday. It's not the prettiest camera around, but it does look professional. Pretty simple to use. Took me a few minutes to figure out that you can adjust the viewfinder (pull it out from to adjust for your eye). I didn't think I would like the touch menu but it's very simple and easy to use. I don't know how to use the camera yet, I have to shoot with it for a while. My exposure with manual and snow is a little off, I am going to adjust the brightness of the LCD to give me a level that is close to the exposure I want.
John |
March 27th, 2008, 04:57 AM | #86 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BRUNEI
Posts: 108
|
Canon 3CCD vs. SONY 1 CMOS Sensor?
I really plan to order this Sony HVR-HD1000, 1st thing keep bothered me is this Real quality cam compared with 3CCD? Currently i was using Canon Xl1s, Is this comparable or better than my Xl1s? since is only Single CMOS Chip sensor?
Appreciated if Anyone can advice me on this 3CCD vs. 1 CMOS Sensor
__________________
Andrew |
March 27th, 2008, 06:47 AM | #87 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17
|
I own a XL1 and love the camera but the image does not compare to HDV. I am amazed at the quality. I still haven't shot a lot of footage but as long as I don't do pans it looks great, oh and the pans don't bother me as much on the 32" LCD then they do when I was watching on the computer.
John |
March 27th, 2008, 10:10 AM | #88 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BRUNEI
Posts: 108
|
Sony HVR-HD1000 (single CMOS DV format) Vs. Canon Xl1 (3CCD DV)
Thanks John,
Have u try Shoot using DV format setting with Sony HVR-HD1000? Sony HVR-HD1000 (single CMOS DV format) Vs. Canon Xl1 (3CCD DV) *Cos sometime clients still required to shoot on DV format Any Idea?
__________________
Andrew |
March 28th, 2008, 02:21 PM | #89 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17
|
Hi Andrew,
I don't think I will ever shoot in DV again. I will always shoot in HDV and downconvert if the clients wants DV. Having the option to have both is great I think. John |
March 29th, 2008, 10:28 AM | #90 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BRUNEI
Posts: 108
|
John,
Shooting in HDV format are more costly especially Buying HDV Cassettes, If the final media ONLY required SD/DV by clients (Then the Only cost saving is using SD MiniDV Cassettes) Since HDV are still very new at our region. not many clients demand on HDV at the moment. Have you test on DV format without downconvert it? How effective the quality compare with 3CCD.
__________________
Andrew |
| ||||||
|
|