|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 23rd, 2007, 01:31 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Owings Mills Maryland
Posts: 26
|
drawbacks shooting in HDV format
This is my first time using the Sony HVR-A1U camera. Is it best to shoot in the HDV format, even though I don't know at this point if I will output the tape to HDV? The work that I am shooting may end up on the web, or on MiniDV, but obviously I'd like to take advantage of the better-quality HDV format, if it will indeed result in a better quality image on the web or MiniDV. Does anyone have a suggestion?
The other issue is playback. I am used to shooting with the Panasonic AG-DVX100A, which I used with an NTSC field monitor. Could anyone recommend an affordable (!) HD field monitor to use with the Sony HVR? Can I use my NTSC monitor with the Sony DVR-A1U if I shoot in the DV format? |
May 23rd, 2007, 01:48 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
I shoot everything in HDV with the A1U. You have the option to have it down convert to regular DV in camera to you computer, no brainer.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 23rd, 2007, 02:43 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Yeah, I'd do everything in HDV until it's time to burn the DVD.
I think you should be able to use an NTSC monitor no matter how you record... using the a/v outputs with either composite or component cables, the cam should downconvert for you even if you shoot in HDV. You may have to adjust the TV TYPE in the menus to play correctly in 4:3. I'm basing this on the HC3 manual, though, so your pro features may vary. Edit: Page 35 of your A1 manual has all the details. http://media.sonyhdvinfo.com/media/p...HVR-A1U-US.pdf Last edited by Adam Gold; May 23rd, 2007 at 02:51 PM. Reason: Found the A1U manual |
May 23rd, 2007, 03:16 PM | #4 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
So I shot in HDV... Edited in HDV in PPro 2. Now I cant get it out of PPro 2. When I use Adobe media encoder.... images come out wasshed out and out of focus. So I decided to use QuickTime Pro. So I exported to DV(SD) avi from Adobe. The file looked really bad. Bad focus ... washed out... So now I do not know what to do... If it was in SD I could have just exported it in SD .. then used Quicktime Pro to do the rest... So now I have the edited timeline in HD and no clue how to get it out.... My only last resort is to do the down convert in camcorder...... rrrrrrrrrrrr frustrating... should have went with FCP |
|
May 23rd, 2007, 06:34 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Owings Mills Maryland
Posts: 26
|
drawbacks shooting in HDV format
Thanks for the responses! I assume I have to Down Convert in camera before capturing in Final Cut Pro? I'm looking on Pg. 61 in the manual and it's not obvious to me how to capture...
Also, I'm not sure if the A1U can do 24 frame progressive like the Panasonic... I appreciate everyone's help in the transition! |
May 23rd, 2007, 06:40 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Saint Cloud, Florida
Posts: 1,043
|
yes - you will have to downconvert in camera. There is a setting for HDV to DV. Be sure to plug in your firewire AFTER that setting change. In your NLE make sure the project is DV 16:9, unless you pillboxed it in camera.
No the A1U will NOT do 24fps. For 24p, your best bet is to shoot 60i and convert with a piece of software. You'll find days of reading on that topic.
__________________
www.facebook.com/projectspecto |
May 26th, 2007, 04:28 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dumfriesshire, UK
Posts: 41
|
FCP 5.1.2 - HDV capture
I'm using FCP 5.1.2 and it can capture HDV 1080i. You need to set this up in "capture settings" (under Audio/Video Settings). Make sure you have set "Device Control Preset" (same dialogue, under "summary") to match or Log and Capture won't work.
You can then use FCP to downconvert later. However, unless your loaded up with slick processors, downconversion WILL take quite a while. Quad Core Intel Mac with fast internal drives takes roughly twice as long as the footage lasts in realtime to squish it down. (If anyone knows any tricks to improve on this please let me know!) I'm blessed with an HD display, though. If you're still fully SD in your suite and your output is to be SD (or lower for web), you might still want to downconvert in camera to save a bit of time later on. Downconverted some footage from HDV 1080i50 to DV PAL last weekend using FCP. Local news was happy enough to broadcast it in their bulletin. BBC reckons downconverted HDV footage looks better than DVCAM shot stuff - but only markedly so if you have access to expensive downconversion hardware, not the in-built options on the camera. Interesting (but ageing) post here on the same topic: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...ghlight=Z1+BBC Happy converting! John |
May 26th, 2007, 03:22 PM | #8 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Quote:
And it would come out better still if you do recapture the tape, down-converting in camera, as a DV project, and then burn from there. But you don't have to do this. This is just based on my experiments with Premiere. |
|
May 27th, 2007, 11:00 AM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Owings Mills Maryland
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
So the quality is the same if the footage is down-converted in camera vs. FCP? If the issue is only time, it seems far more advantageous to down-convert in FCP... By the way, if the output is to SD, is the quality still better if shot in HD and down-converted rather than shot in SD to start with? Please tell me about your HD display. This component is really important, but I'm bracing myself to hear the cost! Cindy |
|
June 4th, 2007, 11:36 AM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Owings Mills Maryland
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Cindy |
|
| ||||||
|
|