|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 22nd, 2007, 04:21 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
HDMI with the HC1?
Did HC1 miss out on the HDMI? Is it only with the HC3?
Last edited by Douglas Spotted Eagle; March 22nd, 2007 at 11:11 PM. Reason: prohibited link |
March 22nd, 2007, 11:02 PM | #2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
|
Sadly there's no hdmi output on the HC1. There are component outs, but I've got no idea if they are uncompressed or not. You can also record direct-to-disc via firewire and a laptop, but I think that is an hdv signal.
|
March 22nd, 2007, 11:11 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Component out on *all* HDV camcorders is uncompressed.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
March 23rd, 2007, 01:52 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Ok, so how can I capture that uncompressed data with a laptop?
|
March 23rd, 2007, 10:36 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
|
Hmm - I'm not aware of anything that works with a laptop, but the black magic cards work great:
http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/hd/ |
March 24th, 2007, 11:13 AM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Ok, the HC1 doesn't have hdmi output, so I am not sure if that would work...yes/no?
Also, component out just has RCA jacks. So am I correct in thinking that there is no way of getting uncompressed to a laptop via this method? |
March 24th, 2007, 11:31 AM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
|
Well like I said, I don't know of a way to capture component HD with a laptop, but using the blackmagic card (with a desktop machine) you use a breakout cable to hookup the component outs of the hc1 to the card (using rca to bnc adapters):
http://www.blackmagic-design.com/pro....asp?prodID=18 |
March 25th, 2007, 04:12 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London United Kingdom
Posts: 77
|
surley you can just use firewire to capture the signal???
|
March 25th, 2007, 08:03 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
I've said this before, but may have been missed in the sheer number of very informative posts here, so I will try to explain again.
Look at this image: http://www.millcon.nl/Harm/HDMI.jpg |
March 25th, 2007, 09:02 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Yes, I can see with the 4:2:0 firewire compared to the 4:2:2 HDMI, it is going to be better off with the HDMI card. Hopefully other manufacturers come out with their own knock-offs and bring down the price.
|
March 25th, 2007, 03:47 PM | #11 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Quote:
My message maybe was not clear enough, but once your shoot is recorded on tape it is stored as 1440x1080 @ 4:2:0 and there is no way you get it back to 1920x1080 @ 4:2:2 format. The info has been lost forever. Even a HDMI connection can not change that fact. HDMI is just a transfer protocol and in essence no different from fire wire, once the data has been stored to tape. ONLY when you capture LIVE, BEFORE RECORDING to tape can you use HDMI or HD-SDI to it's fullest potential, uncompressed @ 4:2:2 but that requires massive storage potential as indicated. |
|
March 25th, 2007, 03:59 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Yes, I think I understand- I want to go directly to laptop - not recording to tape, so I guess that is recording live so-to-speak. Is that what you mean?
|
March 25th, 2007, 04:23 PM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Correct, but I would be interested to hear the specs of your notebook that supports a sustained transfer rate of 200 MB/s (that's MEGA BYTES). I know that a 2 disk SATAII Raid0 @ 7200 RPM will NOT fit the bill, not even close. Even a 2 disk Maxtor Atlas 15K II SCSI array will not meet requirements. If you double click on the thumbnail in my previous post, legibility will be improved. Read my remarks.
|
March 25th, 2007, 05:29 PM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Niagara Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,121
|
Ok, so only with those speeds I will get the 4:2:2. Now I am clear. No my laptop does not have those speeds.
|
March 25th, 2007, 09:04 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Natal, RN, Brasil
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
http://www.cineform.com/products/Tec.../Intensity.htm |
|
| ||||||
|
|