|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 24th, 2006, 12:12 PM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Greenland
Posts: 2
|
Using Cinematone(s)
Hi Everybody, and thank you for all your inputs.
I am from Greenland and part time tv-producer and newly got a A1. My experience with Cinematone 2 is that it tends to be underexposed on colors oversaturated. I like richness of the picture in outdoor shootings, but indoor shots are not very good. What are your experiences? |
July 24th, 2006, 12:23 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
I prefer Cinematone 1 - looks more filmic to me than Cinematone 2. However, both don't feel right. Usually I'll prefer to shoot without any cinematone and try to color correct in post.
|
August 11th, 2006, 05:20 AM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oldenburg, Germany
Posts: 23
|
Using of cinematone(s)
I agree with Alex.
After some research, I have found it's better not to use them, and correct while editing. |
August 14th, 2006, 04:19 AM | #4 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Greenland
Posts: 2
|
Thank you
Yes, I too found out that it is better not to use these "artificial" looks. |
August 21st, 2006, 12:05 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 116
|
I'll throw my hat in with a contrary opinion:
For the best tonal ranges, obviously don't use cinematone. stick with standard and adjust in post. However, with black stretch on and cinematone 1 engaged, My footage looked VERY filmic. I was shooting a scene of some children crabbing for the first time (inner city baltimore kids) and i was shocked at how "documentary film" (almost 70's doc film, even) the footage looked. The effect was killer and it got rid of any fears of looking like the evening news. Thank you Sony. For landscapes, I'll still stick with standard, but for the right project, cinematone 1 works. |
August 21st, 2006, 02:51 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
|
| ||||||
|
|