|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 22nd, 2006, 11:59 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 25
|
Comment on 16:9 quallity - A1
Could someone comment on the quality of the 16:9 image on the HVR-A1. Is there a big difference between the 4:3 image and the 16:9 - I supppose the question should be "is the 16:9 image native?"
I once owned a Cannon Xl1s which I sold in disgust when I realised how poor the 16:9 image was. Since I produce virtually everything in 16:9, this is important to me. Thanks |
July 22nd, 2006, 12:59 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 796
|
All HD is 16:9 native. It's not cropped from a 4:3 image. Many SD cameras are now 16:9 native. The XL2 is a fine example.
__________________
Dave Perry Cinematographer LLC Director of Photography • Editor • Digital Film Production • 540.915.2752 • daveperry.net |
July 22nd, 2006, 08:04 PM | #3 |
Trustee
|
The cmos sensor on the HC1/A1U is actually 4:3 at 1920x1440 effective pixels, but in HDV your pulling off a 16:9 portion at 1440x1080 (which also gives wiggle room for the electronic method of stabilization or "steadyshot").
Switch to camera mode for stills and you'll be using the full sensor surface.
__________________
Pete Ferling http://ferling.net It's never a mistake if you learn something new from it. ------------------------------------------- |
July 22nd, 2006, 08:18 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 25
|
So the quality of the 16:9 image in video mode is as good as in the 4:3 mode...or not?
|
July 22nd, 2006, 09:13 PM | #5 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
On the FX1, I have shot both 16:9 and 4:3 in SD mode, and get a great SD result.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
July 23rd, 2006, 12:16 AM | #6 |
Trustee
|
The image is cropped across the CMOS sensor, using pixel for pixel, where a portion of the upper and lower on the sensor is ignored. You don't stretch/scale/double the image was you would with the XL1s, and other 4:3 imagers. Even so, it's scales down to 1440 on the verticle for HDV compression. So the pixels are there, it just doesn't use them all.
Now in 4:3 DV(SD) mode, I would suppose that it uses the entire effective sensor surface, but what good is that when it's scaled down/compressed to DV25 before it hits the tape? The CMOS sensor in the HC1/A1U is similiar to a still camera imager. The higher end FX1/Z1U cousins use Sony HAD 3 chip CCD's. I've read other post, however, that video shot from an A1U can intercut nicely with that from an FX1\Z1U. My only guess is whether they are 16:9 or 4:3 imagers, pixel for pixel they both meet the HDV spec.
__________________
Pete Ferling http://ferling.net It's never a mistake if you learn something new from it. ------------------------------------------- |
July 23rd, 2006, 11:06 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Its true that the physical sensor on FX1 is 16:9 aspect ratio and physical sensor on A1 is 4:3 aspect ratio, but A1 DOES shoot 'true' 16:9 as Peter said, as for video it uses a 16:9 chunk of the sensor. HDV is always max. 1440 x 1080 pixels.
|
July 24th, 2006, 08:20 AM | #8 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
It looks great in native 16:9 and best in HD. The non-square pixels of the Sony HDV cameras allow it to go to 1920x1080 very nicely.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
| ||||||
|
|