|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 13th, 2006, 06:12 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 117
|
Stills would be great, one from camera, camera slow-mo, and FCP slowmo at the same places. I will try to get it working on my iBook later as I think I should have the best chance on a mac!
__________________
Ainslie Davies - www.dualityproductions.com |
July 14th, 2006, 08:20 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 563
|
OK, same folder as before. Look for files HDR HC3 Regular.png and HDR HC3 Slow Motion.png. I didn't copy a single frame from the FinalCutPro slowed-down clip.
Hope this works better. At the very least, you should get a good idea of the magnitude of the difference. - Martin |
July 14th, 2006, 09:32 PM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 117
|
Cheers for that, wow that is a huge difference! Looks like DV vs HDV!
__________________
Ainslie Davies - www.dualityproductions.com |
July 16th, 2006, 02:56 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
|
Quote:
OTOH, I can see the clip using vlc. ...and I thank you very much for the clip. I was very interested by this slow-motion capability, and considered adding the HC3 to my HC1. Now, I know I don't need to buy the HC3... IMO, the slow-motion footage is not usable. I don't know how they did it, but this slow-motion footage has reduced resolution and severe compression artifacts. And indeed your test was right: the slow-motion from final cut is much better. (I am not saying that the HC3 is a bad camera, BTW; just that this feature is not much use.) |
|
| ||||||
|
|