|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 18th, 2006, 02:49 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Depth of field on A1u?
Does anyone have an recommendations on this? I am looking for ideas on how to accurately get accurate DOF of a large croud from certain distances. There is no known F value setting so any help is appreciated.
|
May 18th, 2006, 09:19 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
DOF is a zone in front of and behind the exact focus point, that is *perceived* to be in focus to the human eye. In fact ONLY the focus point is in sharp focus, but due to the way optics work, objects closer to and further away from the camera can still look sharp and in-focus.
Most people think that the DOF is evenly distributed around the focus point (for example 10meters in-front of focus-point and 10metres behind the focus-point) but this isn't actually true - there will actually be 'more' DOF behind the focus-point than in front of it. So if you're focused on an object at, say, 30metres from the camera, the area considered to be in focus BEYOND that may be an additional 10metres, but the area considered to be in focus IN FRONT of that point may be just 5metres-ish. I'm not aware of any easy way to measure/calculate the DOF at certain apertures. DOF is affected by the distance that the focus-point is away from the camera, and the focal-length of the lens used (i.e. wideangle - to - telephoto) and also the physical size of the sensor. Also remember that the A1 has 2 or 3 ND filters that physically move into the optical path for light levels over a certain value (the PHYSICAL aperture leaves will stay at i think f4). ND filters will NOT affect the DOF, but physical aperture changes DO affect DOF. So even if you camera reported f5.6, chances are that the physical aperture is STILL at f4 but there's now part of an ND filter in the optical path and that's how the camera acheives a 'bogus' f5.6 To cut a long story short, the best way to judge DOF for an object that you want to appear to be fully in-focus is to look carefully through the viewfinder (higher resolution than the LCD screen on the A1) and use the expanded focus setting to check what you want is accpetably in focus. IMO. |
May 18th, 2006, 09:26 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
A couple of general notes though: set the exposure as high as possible (without clipping or getting seriously over-exposed) and zoom in as much as possible (before starting to shoot) to maximze DOF...
Play with it a bit until you get some settings that work dependably for you. |
May 18th, 2006, 09:42 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
Don't you mean zoom *out* as much as possible to maximise DOF? Generally to maximise DOF for a certain camera: - Select small aperture / iris on the lens (must be physical aperture! - see above) - increase distance to subject - use as wide-angle zoom setting as poss. (obviously within the constraints of getting the shot you want) DOF is inherently pretty big on a camcorder with a 1/3in sensor. That's why it's hard to get that really nice very-shallow DOF that you can get on a film SLR or a digital SLR that uses a BIG sensor or even a full-sized 35mm sensor (very very expensive cams these are). |
|
May 18th, 2006, 11:55 AM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Thanks |
|
May 18th, 2006, 01:25 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
Stu:
As you increase the focal length (zoom) any background object in the out of focus area is magnified so you get more blur. Back the camera up away from the subject and zoom in with the iris wide open to get more DOF action. Try it for yourself and then tell me if I'm wrong. :) Michael: There are aperture settings, they just aren't in the form of f-stops... Just bring up the Exposure to as high as you can get away in order to get the most DOF |
May 18th, 2006, 01:43 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Myers , Florida
Posts: 64
|
I think there may be some confusion on here as far as terminology. What does "more" or "less" DOF mean to you? If you open the apeture wide and zoom in close, you will get the narrow depth of field seen in movies where the subject is in focus, but everything behind it is not. It helps to have the background as far away from the subject as possible. The smaller the apeture and the more wide angle you shoot, the DOF will become wider, making a wider range of distance appear to be in focus.
__________________
Evan Dowling HDV 1080i Sony HDR-HC1 |
May 18th, 2006, 01:57 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
Exactly Evan. If a person wants to have that softness for items outside of focus (that you see in film), then they would need to zoom in. This is what most people are trying for I believe.
If, on the other hand, you want everything to be in focus then wide is definitely better...But usually the auto settings on the HC1/A1 will do pretty well give you a pretty wide DOF without help. |
May 18th, 2006, 02:27 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
My interpretation of what Frank said : "and zoom in as much as possible (before starting to shoot) to maximze DOF" is that he meant you get MORE depth-of-field by zooming in and this isn't correct. So it's a terminology thing : I think what Frank means by "DOF" is his wording for *shallow* depth-of-field, i.e. not much in focus in front of or behind the focus-point. I've been using SLR's since the 1980's so i'm fully conversant with DOF issues and also studied quite a lot of optics - it's just frank's term for "DOF" isn't the same as mine! (or the vast majority of other people's either for that matter) |
|
May 18th, 2006, 02:36 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
Exposure itself has nothing at all, inherently, to do with Depth-of-field (shallow or deep). It's *aperture* that affects it (amongst other things), and i believe Frank's comment stems from the fact that most camcorders tend to hang onto their default shutter speed as long as they can. So by "giving it more exposure" (& assuming the shutter speed is constant and we leave gain out of the picture) then the aperture will be bigger, i.e. tending to max. aperture and this will give a shallow Depth-of-field. If you fix shutter speed, and fix gain then, yes, in that sense an increased exposure will mean shallow DOF, but it's ONLY cause if shutter and gain are fixed then the only thing that can vary is aperture and that's what affects DOF. Finally, you CAN see what aperture that the A1 has used for any footage. Not *during* footage, but immediately after, replay the footage, with 'Data Code', 'camera data' enabled and it will give you shutter speed, aperture (as an f-stop), gain in dB, what white-balance was used, and also whether expsoure was automatic or manual. So if you're unsure what aperture cam is using for a scene, shoot 5secs of that scene, quick review with data code on, and then you know. Remember that above a certain brightness the camera will hang on to a physical aperture of f4 and throw in Neutral-Density filters to control light-levels to avoid nasty resolution-limiting diffraction effects. Ultimately it WILL stop down the physical aperture more than f4 but this is in really extreme situation when even all the ND filters in the optical path aren't helping enough. |
|
May 18th, 2006, 02:59 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
I definitely agree with you Stu that it is *aperture* that is really changed, but the place to change it on the HC1/A1 is in the Exposure part of the menu. So again we're really saying the same thing in different ways for the most part. I apologize for the confusion.
What I do personally is lock down the shutter speed to 60 (taking those variables out of the picture) and set the Exposure up to open the aperture more. BTW - It has been mentioned that the Camera Data feedback may not be entirely accurate, which ticks some people off no end. |
May 18th, 2006, 04:17 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Ok. So basically I am looking at a dark picture to get the widest DOF possible? This is assuming I lock down to 1/60 SS.
|
May 18th, 2006, 05:10 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
So you DO want more depth. I'm so used to everybody wanting a shallower DOF so their output will look more like film. Heh.
I owe you a beer Stu! Like most other things, it will be a tradeoff. The best picture will be come from lowering the exposure/aperture settings, but not going so low that it creates gain and noise and pulling the zoom out to the widest shot possible. Have you thought of adding a wide angle lens? They aren't terribly expensive and it looks like you might find it useful.. |
May 18th, 2006, 05:41 PM | #14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
|
|
May 18th, 2006, 05:54 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|