|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 18th, 2006, 07:12 PM | #16 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Amsterdam Holland
Posts: 15
|
hej, here are some cheap findings in search for dof, only not with a1 :(
focus and stability are my problems bothe are made with hdc-1, auto-mode except manual focus, first video; both poor light and good light conditions, winter in sweden with letus lens-adaptor and canon fd 50mm f1.4 lens, .wmv 1500kb/s, 17mb. 1.38min. http://www.streamload.com/xid/sweden_test.wmv second video , my garden in amsterdam and neighbour-cat, medium light condition with sony 0.6x wide-lens / close up first half manual focus, second half autofocus, .wmv hdv-stream, 99mb, 4.19min http://www.streamload.com/xid/poes_hdv.wmv
__________________
digit |
May 18th, 2006, 09:15 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
Floris - respect is due to you. Anyone who is aware of 18% gray cards and what they're for and how camera light meters are calibrated to assume the world is 18% gray (most of the time) gets my vote.... So when Frank buys me that beer, i'll make him buy me two, and iŽll give one to Floris !! |
|
May 18th, 2006, 09:53 PM | #18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
|
|
May 18th, 2006, 10:36 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
I suspect a plot to turn me into a poor and wretched drunk.
I'm down. |
May 18th, 2006, 11:58 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 198
|
Joff, very nice videos. I am wondering if you could share some pictures of your camcorder with the lenses. I would love to be able to achieve similar results.
I am particular interested in the Sweden video you composed. Also, what filter did you use for the last shot with the women profiles? I really enjoyed the dramatic feel to it. |
May 19th, 2006, 02:03 AM | #21 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
[/qu
Quote:
Any feedaback would be greatly appreciated! |
|
May 19th, 2006, 10:45 AM | #22 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
The Sweden video - again, most of the time the women were just out of focus. In this instance, i'd auto focus as the camera should be able to hang onto that subject fine. Or, zoom in, autofocus, then flick to manual focus to hold it if you're concerned the cam will lose focus. nice 'feel' to the vids nevertheless. |
|
May 19th, 2006, 11:31 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
I personally find manual focus the most convenient to use but it will take some practices to apply it to moving subjects. But like Stu mentioned, I really like the feel of the Swedish footage. I guess it is related to the Canon lens.
|
May 21st, 2006, 04:01 AM | #24 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
|
|
May 21st, 2006, 09:12 AM | #25 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
In TAPE mode, select : DATA CODE then: CAMERA DATA. It will show tech info on replay on-screen including : - aperture (f-stop) - shutter-speed - white-balance mode - amount of gain dB - whether camera was in Auto-exposure or Manual exposure mode. Aperture will not get smaller (i.e. smaller physical aperture/iris, BIGGER f-stop number) than f4 on HC1 unless there's a LOT of light. It switches in internal ND filters instead as long as it can. But Depth-of-field for these cams with small sensors is pretty good so i wouldn't worry too much. |
|
May 22nd, 2006, 04:37 AM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Does anyone else have experience with 35mm lens adapters? The premise of those adapters looks promising. But as I have never worked with them, I do not know the advantages and disadvantages. I am also not sure if I want to spend like $300-600 on such a system and lenses.
|
May 22nd, 2006, 03:51 PM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
I always heard the Sony data code isn't always accurate...
|
May 22nd, 2006, 05:33 PM | #28 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
The only item that is of some debate, and this is anyway only on certain Sony cams is the reported aperture. But am pretty certain that this value is accurate on these cams we're referring to. You need to remember that the 'aperture' beyond f4 is most of the time controlled by inline ND filters and therefore its no longer a genuine physical aperture change. All other items, an most likely aperture too, are accurate, and are useful in reviewing footage. |
|
May 23rd, 2006, 09:21 AM | #29 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 157
|
Of course, if the chart at http://hdvforever.com/hdv/exposure/ is accurate, the system of using f-stops is seriously curtailed as the aperture settings available are: 8, 6.8, 5.6, 4.8 and then 4, which is where you start getting the ND filters jumping into play.
|
May 23rd, 2006, 10:08 AM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 90
|
Dof
Hi,
I have been experimenting with my HC1 modes and find that the 'Portrait' mode can be used to reduce DOF. I suspect it simply opens up the Iris to the lowest 'F' value allowed for the given lighting conditions. Conversely there is a 'Landscape' mode that may work to increase DOF although I have not tested this. I have a Canon SLR and it has similiar functions. For the HC1 it is explained on page 44 of the user manual. [For shallow DOF: In brighter light I would add a couple of ND filters onto the front. I have found the optimum background blur to be achieved by zooming in at least half way on the slider -and ideally as much as possible- and placing the subject 1/3 distance to background...] Finally, here is an online DOF calculator to have a play with: http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html Regards, Nick. |
| ||||||
|
|