|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 6th, 2006, 09:55 PM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=152798&is=REG It should be big enough to fit your camera and all your accessories in there. It's not cheap, but its very high quality! |
|
May 7th, 2006, 07:51 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 844
|
For waterproof, almost unbreakable cases try these two manufacturers :
http://www.stormcase.com/ http://www.pelican.com/ |
May 7th, 2006, 08:01 AM | #18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: san francisco, ca
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
I have pretty much the same system as Adam. I have 3 microphones, a matt box with 6 filters, batteries, in another words, lots of stuff. I use the Petrol PWB HDV. I looked at a lot of various manufactures and ultimately settled on Petrol. I feel it is designed and made better than most and best of all cost less than a Porta Brace product. I have a Lowe Pro small back pack that I use when flying and love it dearly. But when I am on the ground traveling by car then I use the Petrol. There is an excellent article on www.dvuser.com about Petrol bags. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation D Kane |
|
May 7th, 2006, 12:02 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 198
|
I have just purchased the Petrol PCCB-1N compact camcorder bag for my HVR-A1U after your recommendation. Hoping it is as good as it sounds.
By the way, it is www.dvuser.co.uk. not .com. The review he is referring to can be found here: http://www.dvuser.co.uk/content.php?CID=49 |
May 7th, 2006, 01:42 PM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
I bought this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...category=43432 You can also try this: http://cgi.ebay.com/SONY-VIDEO-CAMER...QQcmdZViewItem and other bags on eBay. I don't see what the big deal with getting a super quality bag is. It's just a bag. I've had no-name bags for other purposes for years and still using them. |
May 7th, 2006, 01:47 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 198
|
Talk to me in 5-10 years. You'll have gone through at least 2 of them then.
|
May 7th, 2006, 01:49 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
We'll see. I'm very gentle on my bags, so my bags last a long time. Like I said, I've used bags for other applications that are actually much more rugged than I would imagine video needs (such as playing paintball, airsoft, camping, etc. where the bags are transported and dragged in rough, rocky, dirty environments all the time) and I've always used the cheaper bags and no big problems.
Also, if in 5-10 years I only go through 2 bags, or even say 5 bags, at $25 a bag, I'd still be saving more money than if I bought a quality $150+ bag. |
May 7th, 2006, 04:10 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
I believe there is no such a thing as a perfect bag. However, I do like a bag that is comfortable to wear (shoulders) and which servers as a good protection of my camera. I have dozens of bags laying around where I can put my equipment in but with the microphones I need a big with compartments, which firmly holds everything at one place. Also when travelling by airplane for example. With Lowe Pro bags for example, I know you can use them for 10 years without any problems. I really hate buying something, then buying something better, ending up with something good. The first purchases for lets say $20 and $40 are $60 in total of a $150 bag. So that would make a $90 difference. But one bad bag which results in damaged equipment and you can pay like $500 in repair costs.
The bottom-line is that I do not care if it is an expensive bag, but if it is a solid bag with compartments, and above all comfortable to carry. Basically I am looking for two things: one bag like stated above for transportion use in my car to shooting locations, and another one for in the field for walking/biking/hiking/nature documentary etcetera. I really appreciate the help of the members on this board. |
May 7th, 2006, 04:18 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
The Petrol bag looks excellent but the price is as high as the Lowe Pro and the Pots Brace bags in the same size. The Lowe Pro bags are All-Weather and I am not sure if the Petrol bag has the same All-Weater sleeve.
The Lowe Pro bag I had in mind can be found here: http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Shou...ial_AW_DV.aspx It looks very decent to me. If anyone has other suggestion, please let me know cause I want to make a good decision on this one. I also looked at the Porta Brace website and they have this wonderful Hiker product line, which are backpacks, which I think is ideal for nature trips. However, I am not sure which product in this product line is adequate for my HDR-HC1 with microphones, tripod, batteries, cables, filters, wide-angle lens and cleaning equipment. Does anyone know this line? It can be seen at the Porta Brace website: http://www.portabrace.com/landing_us...p?id=25&sid=22 |
May 7th, 2006, 05:05 PM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Another question I have is, when looking for a 82mm UV filter, which filter would I be looking at? Like B+W, Tiffen, Hoya. Of course the filter should not degrade the image quality too much so I guess I am looking at $80 filters?
|
May 7th, 2006, 05:55 PM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 198
|
Alex, when buying cheaper bags, you have to be gentle. That is why some people prefer to spend more on something that can take more a beating. Sometimes when you are out in the field, you don't have time to be meticulous. I try to take care of my bags as well, but sometimes the filming circumstances don't allow me to.
|
May 7th, 2006, 07:48 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
I always make time to take care of my bag and equipment. Even if those situations that seem like you could not take care of the bag, I do. Like I said, even when doing more rigorous activities than filming, my bags still stay in good condition as does my equipment. I really doubt that I'll be changing bags anytime soon or be getting damaged equipment because of buying a cheaper bag. I guess it comes down to how good do you want to feel about your bag and if you're the type who likes to throw his bags around, drag them around, and not take enough time to care for them or not. I treat my bags as if they were the camera (or whatever equipment they hold) themselves. Furthermore, my philosophy is the more expensive the bag, the MORE gently I handle them. I might not care as much tossing around a $25 bag, but tossing around a $150 bag - no. Of course, tossing around bags are just not my philosophy at all, especially if they house expensive equipment.
Last edited by Alex Thames; May 7th, 2006 at 08:50 PM. |
May 11th, 2006, 06:02 PM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ughType=search
How do you think this backpack will suit the HDR-HC1 with Sony Y wideangle and hood attached? Many bags are suited for the Sony PDX-10, which I believe is about the same size as the HDR-HC1/A1 but I am not sure. I do not want a really huge backpack, but a normal sized one like a regular Eastpak bag or something, which will hold all my gear. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont....x=0&image.y=0 This is another bag I am looking at. However, the bag I mentioned above does come with the raincover which costs $85 normally, so if the size of the bags is not too different I prefer the one with the raincover. |
June 29th, 2006, 12:18 AM | #29 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Nice setup. Mike Wade says the only thing missing is the Hoodman, but I've spotted a couple more. Firstly (and ideally) the lens hood for the wide-angle should be a 16:9 aspect ratio. Even more important when you've added another three lens elements to the line-up.
Next up is the extender shoe that allows tapes to be changed while the camera's fixed on the tripod (there's a few of these about now) and a levelling bowl tripod would be grand. tom. |
June 30th, 2006, 12:58 AM | #30 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Also, I setup a page with thumbnails of all those pics at: http://www.adster.net/camera/ |
|
| ||||||
|
|