|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 11th, 2006, 09:22 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 138
|
HC1 viewfinder is cropped?
I think the HC1 viewfinder (and LCD) crop the sides of what is actually being shot. I mention this because I have a Century Optics Fisheye, for which I made a short petal hood. (I lost the one it came with.) When shooting, the hood did not appear on the LCD or viewfinder, however, after capturing the footage and viewing on PC, the lateral lobes of the hood were visible. It would appear to be about a 5% crop on the sides.
|
April 11th, 2006, 09:26 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I'm sure that's the case, as it is with virtually every consumer and prosumer camcorder. The only exception that I know of is the Z1 which has the "allscan" option to show the full frame.
|
April 11th, 2006, 09:44 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
What is the purpose of this cropping? It seems like it would hinder good framing when you record.
|
April 11th, 2006, 09:46 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Well I guess that question should be addressed to Canon, Sony, JVC and Panasonic because most (if not all) their cameras do this (which is known as "overscan"). I suppose their argument would be that all consumer TV's also exhibit a similar amount of overscan, so they're trying to be "WYSIWYG"....
|
April 11th, 2006, 10:21 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 220
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2006, 10:22 PM | #6 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
|
|
April 11th, 2006, 10:33 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
Just wondering why this cropping is called overscan? If it's cropping, doesn't that mean things are cut out, and hence "under"(scan)? Or is the scan referring to something else?
|
April 12th, 2006, 07:35 AM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
It goes back to the CRT days Alex. The electron beam scans across the phosphor on the face of the tube. With overscan the beam is sweeping across an area wider than the face of the tube, so some of the image doesn't show (it's scanning over the edges). In the case of underscan the electron beam doesn't scan as wide as the face of the tube, so you see the full image with a black border around the edges.
|
April 12th, 2006, 01:47 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 220
|
question
Quote:
chris |
|
April 12th, 2006, 04:03 PM | #10 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
|
|
April 12th, 2006, 05:04 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 508
|
But this black border, even if you can see it on the LCD/viewfinder, isn't actually recorded right? You won't see the border in the NLE?
|
April 12th, 2006, 05:22 PM | #12 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
No, the point of the black border is to let you know that you're seeing the entire image inside of it. Going into allscan mode has no effect whatsoever on what you're recording. It's just another way to view the image on the LCD and viewfinder.
|
| ||||||
|
|