|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Thinking about purchasing
Hello,
I've been looking into buying a new camera recently, mostly for short film projects. 24p seems enticing, so I was looking into the DVX100. However, I came across the Sony A1U on b&h; it says it records "HDV 1080 60i/30 Frame/24 Frame". So, this records 24p at HD resolution? I haven't heard anything about this camera until now, how does this compare to the DVX100? Seems to be slightly less expensive, I might be interested. Thanks. Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hawaiian Shirt Mogul
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: northern cailfornia
Posts: 1,261
|
"it says it records "HDV 1080 60i/30 Frame/24 Frame".
P= has come to mean progressive = it doesn't say 24p = it is NOT progressive ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,669
|
The A1's "Cineframe24" mode can provide 24P footage after applying a suitable pulldown. The resolution is not full HD however ... as it is doing some electronic fieldblending.
Do a search on CF24 and you'll find extensive info in the forum on the pros and cons. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Thanks for the info. Besides the 24p issue, how do you think this camera rates compared to the dvx100?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, UK
Posts: 47
|
The DVX is the 'shooter's' camera of the two. No nonsense, out of the box - in your hand progressve with a gamma look that is all it's own. I know - I own a Z1 and a HC1 - great cameras, but the A1 is going to be limited on its own. Resolution matters aside, I look back from these HDV days to my DVX100 footage with some regret. There's something special about the footage that camera creates ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8
|
This is a useful thread -- I'm considering buying an HDR-HC1, or a DVX100 -- I've got a friend who owns the DVX100 and he's a rabid proponent of it. But I'm relucant to commit to previous-generation technology when I can go to 1080i at such a reasonable price. I've looked into the DVFilm Maker utility for 24P conversion, and it looks like good technology; I've seen a 1080i-24p conversion previously that I thought looked good, though I don't know how that particular conversion was done.
Latitude worries me. Can someone tell me, or point me at a resource, that would give me the relative latitudes for 35 mm film, the DVX100, and the HDR-HC1? I'm sure the HDR-HC1 will lose that comparison, but how badly it loses would be of interest to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8
|
Went ahead and bought it. $1349 at the local Best Buy. $1461 with tax. 14 days to return it, 15% restocking -- though I don't expect to return it.
Allegedly the component output is uncompressed -- would be nice, if true. 1080i at 4:4:4 for $1349? Yowza. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
Dan
HDV is 4:2:0. You can load the HDV images into 4:2:2 or 4:4:4 HD formats by various means, but the actual acquired color sampling is only 4:2:0. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8
|
So I see. Been reading up myself. Still unclear if the component out is uncompressed?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8
|
Yep, uncompressed. 7th post in this forum. I'll just shut up now until I've read through the forum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|