|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 12th, 2006, 07:08 AM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LONDON, UK
Posts: 32
|
Glad you got Pinnacle working. I'm using the latest beta and still can't write to tape in HDV. However, even if I could, my PC isn't up to editing .m2v on the timeline - it jerks and stutters (although it's not too bad if I use the m2t in Vegas Media Studio Pro). Maybe if I upgraded to a dual core Athlon, which is possible with my mobo, it would be better in this respect. Are you Intel or Athlon based?
If your PC is up to it, I can't see that using an intermediate like Cineform would be of any help if colour rendition wasn't an issue. Just carry on and edit natively. By the way, doesn't Premiere Pro 2 come with the Cineform codec anyway? I was toying with the idea of getting it but won't if the codec isn't included as I would need to render to intermediate. Of course, it wouldn't be the real time encoding that Cineform Aspect would do though.
__________________
Premiere Pro 2. Sony HC1E cam. Athlon 64 4000+. 2gig Corsair RAM. ATI X800 Pro AGP graphics card. 2X SATA drives dedicated to video as RAID 0 |
February 12th, 2006, 04:57 PM | #17 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Cineform In Adobe PP 2.0- and Pinnacle Studio
Quote:
I am currently working with HD Aspect with my PP 2.0. Frankly, I am beginning to wonder what you pay $ 500 for. They say using their Transitions and video effects gives near real time editing capability, but that is only in the preview. You can actually see the effects of using the regular adobe effects and transitions by scrubbing anyway. And, when you have to actually render back to tape, or to mt2, or any other format, the render takes so long in the HDV mode. I see absolutely no benefit to Cineform in that respect. Cineform Aspect also did not appear to have it own real time keying effect, so, unless I missed it, there seems to be now benefit there either. Pinnacle Studio seems to render back to the tape and the .mt2 much faster, if you get it running right. I think this is because Pinnacle only actually rerenders the parts of the file that have been edited and some hou just appends the unedited portions. It also back round renders as you edit, which may create some problems with slower systems. I think this is part of the benefit of the Liquid engine it has. I rendered a 3 minute edit with 3 transitions for tape back to my FX1 and it took less than 10 minutes, including actual recording. I tried a similar edit in PP 2.0 using both the m2t direct edit, and also using Cineform. The render for a 1 min 40 sec clip was over 25 minutes, as I recall. This surprised me quite a bit. I do have a 256 mgbyte PCI express video card, that PP 2.0 by some accounts is supposed to utilize, but that render seemed awful slow. One thing that is obvious is that it is rerendering the entire sequence. By the way, the Cineform codec comes with PP 1.51, but not with 2.0. However, when my Aspect trial runs out, I have been led to believe that the codec will still be there, but I will lose all of the real time benefits of Aspect.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
February 12th, 2006, 11:26 PM | #18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LONDON, UK
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
The demo has very few presets for projects but I think this is because it has no HDV capture option. Can you assure me that the full version of Preimere Pro 2 has project presets for a 1080 50i project for frame size 1440x1080, or did you have to adust the project settings yourself.
__________________
Premiere Pro 2. Sony HC1E cam. Athlon 64 4000+. 2gig Corsair RAM. ATI X800 Pro AGP graphics card. 2X SATA drives dedicated to video as RAID 0 |
|
February 13th, 2006, 04:12 AM | #19 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
February 13th, 2006, 06:01 AM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 70
|
Hi Chaz
Have you thought of Edius from Canopus. I use this with my JVC HD 100 and it works great! You can download a 30 day full feature trial here: http://www.canopus.com/canopus/press/whatshot.php Hope this helps Tony |
February 15th, 2006, 12:35 PM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LONDON, UK
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
__________________
Premiere Pro 2. Sony HC1E cam. Athlon 64 4000+. 2gig Corsair RAM. ATI X800 Pro AGP graphics card. 2X SATA drives dedicated to video as RAID 0 |
|
February 15th, 2006, 01:12 PM | #22 |
Trustee
|
First the codec is still there. Second, if you open a previous CFHD project, a message will inform you that the project will open in VFW (video for windows) mode. If you try to render to CFHD (for HD export), the render will not proceed until you enter a key. Since I have v1.5 of PPro, I am still able to render to a "cineform avi" (assuming that it's the version that came bundled with PPro 1.5).
Not sure about 2.0. Also, I could not import/reuse any rendered CFHD media -the app locks up. I'm still evaluating this and have started a thread with an issue on the v4 codec in the cineform forum (probably where this thread should be heading -so I'll end here). |
February 15th, 2006, 01:45 PM | #23 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
Because I only had one day left, I uninsalled Aspect 4.0. It looks like the codec will remain for players. Also, if you have Premeire Pro 1.51 on system already, the codec is part of that capture system. But it does not remain as preset on 2.0. so it looks like I SHOULD BE ABLE TO CAPTURE IN 1.51 AND EDIT IT ON 2.0. I will check it out further.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
February 15th, 2006, 02:18 PM | #24 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
Follow up. I was able to capture in cineform format with PP 1.51. I imported captured files to 2.0 . And I was even able to render those file with transitions to a Cineform encoded file. (under export to movie, I was able to select the Cineform Codec)
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
February 15th, 2006, 02:32 PM | #25 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
Further comment: It looks like some audio problems are popping up with using the Cineform cdec to render. I had sound off, so I didn't notice this at first.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
February 16th, 2006, 09:47 AM | #26 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Is my reply invisible!? I think it is realy uncool when someone tries to help with a request and gets completely ignored. Especially when the reply seems to answer the question. A simple "Tried it, didn't like it. Or don't like Canopus..anything!" would have been fine and how much of your time would it have taken? Cheers Tony |
|
February 18th, 2006, 03:01 PM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 48
|
Hello Tony.
I haven't followed this thread for a while (Been shooting alot and haven't tried much editing yet) so I will try your sugesstion and get back to you Thanks! |
February 19th, 2006, 01:19 AM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 29
|
Quick Clarification On Connect HD / Vegas
Chaz,
I wasn't sure from your previous posts. Did you actually try capturing with Connect HD's capture utility which is totally separate from Vegas? The output from the Connect HD process is an AVI which can be processed in Vegas and rendered as AVI without an MPEG dependency. Does the Vegas demo not even allow you to import HD content in AVI form? |
February 19th, 2006, 10:01 AM | #29 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 48
|
I couldn't get it to work... but then again it very well could be me, not the program constraints.
|
| ||||||
|
|