|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 17th, 2005, 02:32 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 221
|
Sony HDV camcorder for less than 2.000 $
Sony HDR-HC1 is a HDV 1080i camcorder with 1 (one) 3 megapixel 4:3 CMOS sensor and sort of full manual controls.
Price da da da daaaa - <2.000 $ when it hit the stores in juli. Camcorder Info has the story. www.camcorderinfo.com The official press release is here: http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5930 And there will be a Sony PDX10-like pro edidion as well (3.500 $) in the fall. The official press release for this edition is here: http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5925 Hopefully Canon has something in the pipeline .... |
May 17th, 2005, 06:04 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 234
|
WOW! As a PDX10 user who loves the tiny form factor, that HVR-A1U "pro" model is making me drool! I can't afford one anytime soon, and obviously I'll want to see what its footage looks like (it's got to be better than a PDX10, simply because it's HD, right?) but I do think I know what I'll be starting to save my pennies for.
:-) |
May 17th, 2005, 08:22 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
It does look cool, but I wouldn't automatically assume that it's "got to be better than the PDX-10". It certainly seems to have the same XLR box and mike. It appears to have a switchable focus/zoom ring. Other than that, the photos don't show much in the way of manual control. I hope they haven't gone the way of the HC-1000 and moved everything to the touch screen...
|
May 17th, 2005, 08:26 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 234
|
Well, that is certainly a good point. The camera could easily have been dumbed-down by SONY to a point that would render it useless for many people.
But I was speaking about the image quality, not functionality. |
May 17th, 2005, 08:44 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 24
|
If I'm reading this correctly this is going to be a one chip camera.
Of all the things I could see Sony doing to dumb down the PDX10 this wasn't one of them. I hope it comes with 3 chips. |
May 17th, 2005, 09:34 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,652
|
Wow, I was going to hold off on HDV, but this looks pretty hard to pass up. Come on Canon, don't make me buy a Sony!
|
May 17th, 2005, 10:29 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
I agree with Chris. Why one chip? Oh well, perhaps they have improved it to the point where it sill look as good as the FX1/Z1 but with fewer options. I doubt it though.
|
May 17th, 2005, 11:27 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rego Park , NYC
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
|
|
May 17th, 2005, 12:11 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 231
|
Maybe the street price will be lower, say about $2500?
__________________
Sony Z7U, Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 24-105 F4L, Canon 70-200 F2.8L, Canon 580 EXII, Zoom H2. |
May 17th, 2005, 01:16 PM | #10 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
But who knows? It may very well be a terrific camera. My point was just that it's very premature to assume that "it's got to be better than the PDX-10." |
|
May 17th, 2005, 01:24 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
The consumer version is supposed sell for 1,700 USD. It uses 3 MP CMOS. Sony makes CMOS for Nikon. The quality should be fine. Sony claimed 1080i is going to have 90% of HDV market.
This camera will make good second camera to FX/Z1. I'd like to buy one. PS3 will have 1080p output. This is year when HD will start seriously replacing SD. Radek |
May 17th, 2005, 02:17 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF, Ca
Posts: 421
|
I want one. This will be a great cam to use before the Panny hvx gets here. Plus Sony hopefully will be applying downward pricing pressure on Panny products.
Anyone know how big the lens is? |
May 17th, 2005, 02:25 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF, Ca
Posts: 421
|
Comparison chart between the two cams
|
May 19th, 2005, 06:45 AM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
There seems to be a rather entertaining post missing.
|
May 19th, 2005, 08:00 AM | #15 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
I appreciate your evaluation of that missing post as "entertainment," in fact I found it entertaining as well, but our policy here at DV Info Net is that we don't allow trash-talking of any format, especially such highly opinionated garbage about equipment that the offending poster hasn't even seen or touched with his own hands. How one can evaluate something they have no direct experience with is simply beyond my ability to understand. I'd like to urge that person to find something that he likes and write positive things about that, instead of dwelling on negativity which is so poorly perceived anyway.
There are enough posts about these new camcorders that it might be time for their own dedicated forum now. Hope this helps, |
| ||||||
|
|