|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 19th, 2009, 06:42 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
HC9 auto gain feature
Hi all,
Does anyone knows a way to get rid of the HC9 auto gain, or at least limit it to a low value? All thoughts on this matter will be much appreciated. Thanks |
February 20th, 2009, 08:57 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
No One? :(
|
February 21st, 2009, 08:24 AM | #3 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
|
It's something I would really like to know, too.
|
February 21st, 2009, 11:25 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
You can't control it directly, but you can assign the scroll wheel to exposure and make sure you are always four to six notches to the left of the maximum (18dB). Each notch is 3dB in most exposure modes, so six to the right is 0dB gain. Up to six, even nine dB is not really noticeable.
|
February 21st, 2009, 02:48 PM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
I don't know if I expressed correctly. Imagine f/1.8 as maximum aperture. In low light you open the iris to max to a point (say, just for the purpose that it's the exposure bar middle point), and if you continue to dial the exposure it will kick up the gain bacause it doesn't have any more iris to open? Thanks |
|
February 21st, 2009, 04:13 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 909
|
In Photo Mode, the Auto-gain Goes Off
And sometimes, the only way to get a still photo in very dim light, is to shoot it in video mode, so the auto-gain will bring up the level.
__________________
Steve McDonald https://onedrive.com/?cid=229807ce52dd4fe0 http://www.flickr.com/photos/22121562@N00/ http://www.vimeo.com/user458315/videos |
February 22nd, 2009, 10:40 AM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Quote:
So you can control gain by just avoiding the last six steps on the bar. |
|
February 22nd, 2009, 01:30 PM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
I’ve been thinking the pros and cons about buying a HC9 camera. Everybody states that HV30 has a superior image but I really need a LANC port. On the other hand the low light performance that many reviews had with the HC9 is keeping me back. But if you say I just can control auto gain that way I think I can take the noise down on low light situations. I'm willing to sacrifice info and recording really black where's no sufficient light than capture info with noise in it! |
|
February 22nd, 2009, 07:16 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 909
|
Quote:
The HC9 has a roller control that can be designated for any one of several functions, including manual exposure and shutter speed. I have learned that with fast-moving subjects, it's best to manually set it at 60 fps (in your case, 50 fps), to keep the motion sufficiently blurred and to avoid strobing of wings or legs. This will also keep the gain from rising so much in lower light levels, due to the auto system having increased the shutter speed. You can see many other videos on my Vimeo album that I shot near sunset, sometimes in heavily-shaded swamps. If you register for a free subscription with Vimeo, you can download my videos, to see them at a much higher bit-rate and better quality, than directly viewing them on their website. The Vimeo playback is so heavily compressed, there is often jerkiness in the motion. I'm very pleased by the faultless function of my HC9 and there's a lot to be said for the dependability and longterm durability of videotape. I have evaporated-metal Hi-8 tapes, of the same type formulation used by DV and HDV, that are 20 years old and still playing back without any loss of quality (something that shows up quickly in analog recording, if the tape is degraded). It doesn't appear that Sony is going to make any more small HDV camcorders of this type, so the HC9 is the last one that will be available. I'm glad it uses interlaced scanning. When you combine a CMOS with progressive scan, there can be a serious problem with rolling shutter, which has an especially bad effect on videos of moving subjects. For a high-performance telextender for the HC9, that doesn't vignette above 30% in the zoom range, you might try the Sony VCL-DH1758. It's a 1.7X telex, that is designed for high-resolution still cameras, but is ideal for small camcorders. I mount it with a 37mm to 58mm step-up ring, that I bought from B & H, one of the few places that carry such a step-ring, that adapts over a size range that wide. Its extra barrel size, is a main reason that it vignettes only in the bottom 30% of the zoom, while 37mm telextenders may cause vignetting at any point below 70% or 80% of the range. It can be bought for only about $100. (U.S.) and is a big bargain at that price. For a photo of my HC9 on a shoulder-mount and a description of the accessories I have bought or made for it, go to this thread: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/hdv2-sony...cessories.html
__________________
Steve McDonald https://onedrive.com/?cid=229807ce52dd4fe0 http://www.flickr.com/photos/22121562@N00/ http://www.vimeo.com/user458315/videos Last edited by J. Stephen McDonald; February 22nd, 2009 at 08:01 PM. |
|
February 23rd, 2009, 04:21 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 626
|
Quote:
|
|
February 23rd, 2009, 05:24 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
Hi Stephen,
Many thanks for all your info. It really helps to make a decision. I've been watching your videos. Cool stuff and impressive performance in low light as you had mentioned! I was under the impression that it performed much worse on those situations. About telex and so, I'm planing to use it with my 35mm adapter. I mostly do documentary work and it's a pain doing a all day work with a XH-A1 fully loaded with 35mm adapter and bits on the shoulder. The HC9 takes about 2Kg from my shoulder and the whole rig becomes the same weight as the Canon XH-A1 alone! I'm going to buy it definitely. Thanks once again. |
February 23rd, 2009, 06:13 AM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 909
|
Quote:
Thanks, Nelson, for your remarks. I'm glad you found my descriptions of the HC9 useful in making a decision. I'll be interested in seeing how that 35mm adaptor works out on this little camera. I used to pack around a full-sized Beta camcorder, on a counter-weighted shoulder-mount, that had a total weight of 10.5 Kg., so I understand how the HC9 will be an advantage for you. I once shot a speech by a presidential candidate, that lasted two hours with the big rig and it took me a couple of days to recover. I expected it to last just half an hour, but you know how politicians are.
__________________
Steve McDonald https://onedrive.com/?cid=229807ce52dd4fe0 http://www.flickr.com/photos/22121562@N00/ http://www.vimeo.com/user458315/videos |
|
February 23rd, 2009, 03:24 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
|
February 23rd, 2009, 08:48 PM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,669
|
Adam is correct - manual exposure is disabled when the camera is in nightshot mode. (Apparently people were using the mode in daylight to see through other folks' light clothing - ahem!).
I believe there is a company that offered to engineer the Sony nightshot mode for use in wildlife film-making - essentially adding a switch that moves the IR filter away from the sensor. There is a thread about that here: HDR-HC9 Conversion for Infrared use - The Digital Video Information Network Edit: D'oh! That was your thread, Alastair. Sorry.... |
February 23rd, 2009, 08:59 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lisboa / Portugal
Posts: 45
|
I'll be posting footage as soon I'll buy the camera which I'm planning to do this week. I'm also expecting to receive my SgBlade this week so I'll be eager to try it out. (...) and yes, I know how politicians are! I live in Portugal... So there's plenty of them around here! Unfortunately :)
|
| ||||||
|
|