March 12th, 2008, 10:38 PM | #46 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 224
|
I can't see one of these being $1,000...but then again, we are talking about Sony here...
But then again, I couldn't see it going for $70 either. |
March 13th, 2008, 02:08 AM | #47 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
It'd be even nicer if it started and stopped when you pressed Record on the XH-A1. Anyway let's wait and see what price Sony decide to sell it at.
Richard |
March 13th, 2008, 09:17 AM | #48 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 532
|
My bad I meant 700-1000. Personally think 500 would be fair, but like Richard said we're talking about sony, so I raised it. Maybe firestore or someone can reverse engineer it, because the only thing that would improve it would being able to take canon batteries.
Also I tried it with my friend's HD100, so it looks like it works with any flavor of hdv, hdv1 or hdv2. |
March 13th, 2008, 10:31 AM | #49 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 226
|
Nice! Okay, I'm sold. Now I just need...sigh...money again... :)
__________________
Canon EOS 7D, Final Cut Studio 2 |
March 13th, 2008, 12:20 PM | #50 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 8
|
evan any idea when this will be available for the Canon
Does anyone have an idea when this will be available for the Canon or sold on its own. I am very interested.
Quote:
|
|
March 14th, 2008, 06:55 AM | #51 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,488
|
Hmmmm. Interesting
Requires 133x high speed CF cards, not any old CF will do. Considering that many other all digital recorders (with internal A/D and D/A as well, go for $400 give or take (e.g,,MicroTrack). $700-$1000 sounds like a likely price point considering the price Sony has put on other "Walkman" form factor video recording/playback devices in the past; e.g., the GV-Axxx, GV-Dxxx and GV-HDxxx series toys.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
March 14th, 2008, 07:21 AM | #52 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
However Sony will be selling it separately, but no price or date has beens et as of yet. I talked to a Sony rep this past Tuesday, and I thought that he told me it might be available in May sometime. Again, he didn't know a price. |
|
March 14th, 2008, 10:16 AM | #53 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 532
|
Quote:
|
|
March 14th, 2008, 02:34 PM | #54 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 89
|
Evan,
Can recording start/stop be controlled on the Canon or do you absolutely have to start/stop on the Sony CF unit? Also, does anyone know the workflow when using the CF recorded files with Final Cut? Does Sony offer a clip importer like it does with the EX1? Thanks, Paul |
March 14th, 2008, 03:45 PM | #55 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western Minnesota
Posts: 227
|
Hello All,
Help me out here. I get the impression, from reading threads on this forum, that the perception is that the A-1 tape system is so fragile that a tapeless system is imperative. Is that true? If it isn't true, I'm guessing that my A-1 tape system will work well for many hours/days/months or a year or two until something non-linear cheap and reliable is developed for my A-1. Not true? Tx |
March 14th, 2008, 07:14 PM | #56 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 288
|
I would think that the odds are very good that your A1 tape system will work flawlessly for years. I don't think there is any particular reason that it would be considered fragile. Some people will be using their's on a daily basis, which might increase the risk of mechanical failure, but it still would be unlikely that it would happen. That's my take anyway.
Pat |
March 15th, 2008, 12:00 AM | #57 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
The A1 tape mechanism seems fine, although some people have reported problmes with it. The 2 reasons I am interested in tapeless are to avoid tape drop-outs and to replace the tape capture stage with file copying which is much faster.
Richard |
March 15th, 2008, 12:42 AM | #58 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Topanga, CA
Posts: 139
|
Me too Richard...that's the good part of this unit.
David |
March 15th, 2008, 05:13 AM | #59 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
All that's true of such as the Firestore as well, but in principle, a device like this is far more elegant. |
|
March 15th, 2008, 09:28 AM | #60 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western Minnesota
Posts: 227
|
Thanks for the replies. The info provided helped to clarify this issue for me.
Take care. |
| ||||||
|
|