|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 10th, 2006, 12:23 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
XDCAM progressive modes
When the camera first came out there was some information going around that the XDCAM HD was using some sort of trick that lost resolution in order to get progressive scan. However I just found this comment by Clive Cannon over on the NZ Crews website where he said;
"Yes, they are interlace, but associated with each CCD is a DRAM frame memory that allows TRUE progressive readout from the interlace CCDs - clever huh? " http://www.nzcrews.tv |
December 10th, 2006, 12:39 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I was told that there is no loss of resolution and they used a trick that offset the scans of the G and R/B chips to create the progressive image. My guess is that this process would involve the use of some form of memory buffer, so maybe were both correct.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
December 10th, 2006, 03:34 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
I knew about the interlace, because when we did the Texas camera tests we got lower V res readings. so that big hint coupled with the hearsay flying around multiple boards kinda spelled it out.
Not that it matters. They did a great job with it. If you turn the shutter off in 24p, the V res returns.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
December 10th, 2006, 03:42 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mossyrock Wa USA
Posts: 65
|
What is "V res?"
Michael Knight. (I'm not embarrassed about asking questions coz I ain't no dummy. My mother just dresses me this way....).
__________________
All media since 1960. Formerly CP16/Nagra. Currently learning F350/Fujinon HSs18 x 5.5BRM, Mac G5 Quad and FCP Studio. |
December 10th, 2006, 04:01 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Vertical resolution.
To clarify even further, the ability to discern, say, a bunch of tightly spaced HORIZONTAL lines. Sometimes people can confuse just what the "vertical" is referring to.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
August 1st, 2007, 01:15 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Just going to dig this one up again since there was no satisfactory resolve to it.
Nate, did you try the camera in 60i and 30p to see if the same thing happened with the shutter? |
August 31st, 2007, 11:26 AM | #7 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Venice ITALY
Posts: 22
|
XDCAM progressive modes
Quote:
|
|
August 31st, 2007, 11:31 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Just had some test shots back from Nigel Cooper. He recreated the shutter on/off test in 25p mode using DSC Labs resolution chart. There is some definite loss of resolution when the shutter is turned on in 25p mode.
Seemingly it isn't progressive scan mode itself that loses resolution. But something definitely happens when you turn the shutter on to 1/50th. Something that you have to do when shooting proscan footage in 25p to avoid motion smeariness. |
August 31st, 2007, 11:52 AM | #9 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Sorry I missed this first time around, but yeah, we definitely saw this at the Texas shootout.
It's not bad enough to make an impact in any real work, though. Non-issue for me.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
September 1st, 2007, 11:31 AM | #10 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Venice ITALY
Posts: 22
|
XDCAM progressive modes
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|