|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 3rd, 2006, 02:40 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
Are you sure you can't export via HD SDI, I can do it from my BMD Extreme card and they have no easy setup for XDCam HD too. I simply create an XDCam timeline then change the easy setup to anything with 1080i output and I get output in real time.
|
October 3rd, 2006, 02:48 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 165
|
You make a good point Steve. I'm working in 24p so I guess i could import via XDCam Transfer in "35mbps 1080p24 VBR", make sure my sequence settings match then when I'm ready to export, choose a Kona 3 output that has 1080p24. Hmmm, seems too simple but I'll try it. Am I taking a quality hit by transcoding the native XDCam HD codec to the Kona HD-SDI output?
|
October 3rd, 2006, 03:44 PM | #18 | ||
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
||
October 3rd, 2006, 04:15 PM | #19 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
Actually, come to think of it, it's not adding the pulldown. Before FCP 5.1.2 we worked with Sony XDCam HD at 35mbps/ 24p and imported it into FCP via Kona 3 using Kona 1080p/24 Easy Setup (created huge files but worked). Exported finished product via same Kona Easy Setup in FCP to Sony F-70 deck via HD-SDI in real time and all worked flawlessly (except of course for the massive file sizes resulting from the "Uncompressed" material. Good thing we had a big ol' XServe Raid). Sony deck was in 24p mode frequency and accepted the signal from the 24p timeline (If it was in 24p system mode and I was trying to feed it 60i material, I assume it would have rejected it just like it does when you try to put a 60i disk into it when it is in 24p system mode). If logic holds here, we should be able to export Kona 1080p/24 material (regardless of its original codec) from a Sony XDCam HD 24p timeline without a problem... Famous last words... More to come tomorrow... |
|
October 10th, 2006, 09:16 PM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 173
|
Greg,
Are you saying the F-70 Deck allows for faster input for an Apple then going thru the Camera's firewire port into the Apple? Is there a chart out there that shows typical transfer/conversion times between the XDCAM and a Mac Pro Tower, Etc? thanks, rob |
October 11th, 2006, 12:55 AM | #21 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
My experience with the F70 is that the transfers are just a little faster than direct from the camera, but not by a huge amount. That said the F70 is more responsive when navigating through the proxies.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
| ||||||
|
|